Lightweight Prompt Engineering for Cognitive Alignment in Educational AI: A OneClickQuiz Case Study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into educational technology promises to revolutionize content creation and assessment. However, the quality and pedagogical alignment of AI-generated content remain critical challenges. This paper investigates the impact of lightweight prompt engineering strategies on the cognitive alignment of AI-generated questions within OneClickQuiz, a Moodle plugin leveraging generative AI. We evaluate three prompt variants-a detailed baseline, a simpler version, and a persona-based approach-across Knowledge, Application, and Analysis levels of Bloom's Taxonomy. Utilizing an automated classification model (from prior work) and human review, our findings demonstrate that explicit, detailed prompts are crucial for precise cognitive alignment. While simpler and persona-based prompts yield clear and relevant questions, they frequently misalign with intended Bloom's levels, generating outputs that are either too complex or deviate from the desired cognitive objective. This study underscores the importance of strategic prompt engineering in fostering pedagogically sound AI-driven educational solutions and advises on optimizing AI for quality content generation in learning analytics and smart learning environments.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2025.
Builds on
4 of 23 references.
References · 4
- 2023Generative AI: Implications and Applications for Educationcited by 8
- 2025Assessing AI-Generated Questions' Alignment with Cognitive Frameworks in Educational Assessmentcited by 8
- 2025Analyzing Feedback Mechanisms in AI-Generated MCQs: Insights into Readability, Lexical Properties, and Levels of Challengecited by 4
- 2025Enhancing AI-Driven Education: Integrating Cognitive Frameworks, Linguistic Feedback Analysis, and Ethical Considerations for Improved Content Generationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.