mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Frequency-Aware Model Parameter Explorer: A new attribution method for improving explainability

arXiv 2510.03245 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

State-of-the-art attribution methods such as AttEXplore rely on adversarial sample generation that applies an all-pass filter across the frequency spectrum: they perturb all frequencies of the input image alike, from the low frequencies that carry coarse shape to the high frequencies that carry edges and textures. However, models rely on low and high frequencies to different degrees, and such an all-pass perturbation cannot adapt to the model being explained, which limits the faithfulness of the resulting attribution maps. We propose FAMPE (Frequency-Aware Model Parameter Explorer), an attribution method that overcomes this limitation by perturbing the low- and high-frequency bands of the input independently, so that the perturbation can be shifted toward the band that matters for the model. The boundary between the two bands is set for each image automatically from its spectral energy. On ImageNet with five convolutional neural network and Vision Transformer architectures, FAMPE significantly improves the Insertion Score over the strongest baseline, AttEXplore, on four of them, by up to 15.4%, at essentially the same computational cost. How the perturbed frequency bands are weighted matters: the best and the worst balance between them differ by 19-36% in Insertion Score, and the best balance depends on the architecture. Choosing the balance for each image with a probe that needs no ground truth raises the Insertion Score significantly further on all five architectures, reaching up to 24.4% above AttEXplore. Controlling which frequency band is perturbed is therefore a simple, low-cost way to improve attribution faithfulness.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.

Builds on

20 of 33 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  4. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  5. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  6. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  7. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  8. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
  9. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 582
  10. 2022MaxViT: Multi-Axis Vision Transformercited by 476
  11. 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
  12. 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
8 more
  1. 2016Layer-wise Relevance Propagation for Neural Networks with Local Renormalization Layerscited by 199
  2. 2021Guided Integrated Gradients: An Adaptive Path Method for Removing Noisecited by 102
  3. 2018Low Frequency Adversarial Perturbationcited by 80
  4. 2021Fast Axiomatic Attribution for Neural Networkscited by 35
  5. 2021Robust Models Are More Interpretable Because Attributions Look Normalcited by 21
  6. 2023MFABA: A More Faithful and Accelerated Boundary-based Attribution Method for Deep Neural Networkscited by 7
  7. 2024Explainable AI for Mental Disorder Detection via Social Media: A survey and outlookcited by 6
  8. 2017A Deep Causal Inference Approach to Measuring the Effects of Forming Group Loans in Online Non-profit Microfinance Platformcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.