One Patch to Caption Them All: A Unified Zero-Shot Captioning Framework
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Zero-shot captioners are recently proposed models that utilize common-space vision-language representations to caption images without relying on paired image-text data. To caption an image, they proceed by textually decoding a text-aligned image feature, but they limit their scope to global representations and whole-image captions. We present a unified framework for zero-shot captioning that shifts from an image-centric to a patch-centric paradigm, enabling the captioning of arbitrary regions without the need of region-level supervision. Instead of relying on global image representations, we treat individual patches as atomic captioning units and aggregate them to describe arbitrary regions, from single patches to non-contiguous areas and entire images. We analyze the key ingredients that enable current latent captioners to work in our novel proposed framework. Experiments demonstrate that backbones producing meaningful, dense visual features, such as DINO, are key to achieving state-of-the-art performance in multiple region-based captioning tasks. Compared to other baselines and state-of-the-art competitors, our models achieve better performance on zero-shot dense captioning and region-set captioning. We also introduce a new trace captioning task that further demonstrates the effectiveness of patch-wise semantic representations for flexible caption generation. Project page at https://paciosoft.com/Patch-ioner/ .
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2025.
Builds on
57 of 70 references.
References · 57
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
- 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
38 more
- 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
- 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,046
- 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,462
- 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,362
- 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,188
- 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 968
- 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 824
- 2021RegionCLIP: Region-based Language-Image Pretrainingcited by 616
- 2022Detecting Twenty-thousand Classes using Image-level Supervisioncited by 614
- 2021LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image text Tuningcited by 577
- 2022Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation with Mask-adapted CLIPcited by 565
- 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 561
- 2021ClipCap: CLIP Prefix for Image Captioningcited by 559
- 2021DenseCLIP: Language-Guided Dense Prediction with Context-Aware Promptingcited by 532
- 2021Scaling Open-Vocabulary Image Segmentation with Image-Level Labelscited by 473
- 2023Scaling Open-Vocabulary Object Detectioncited by 343
- 2025LLaVA-OneVision-1.5: Fully Open Framework for Democratized Multimodal Trainingcited by 244
- 2019Connecting Vision and Language with Localized Narrativescited by 226
- 2015DenseCap: Fully Convolutional Localization Networks for Dense Captioningcited by 176
- 2023Alpha-CLIP: A CLIP Model Focusing on Wherever You Wantcited by 151
- 2021ZeroCap: Zero-Shot Image-to-Text Generation for Visual-Semantic Arithmeticcited by 150
- 2022GRiT: A Generative Region-to-text Transformer for Object Understandingcited by 121
- 2022Open Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation with Patch Aligned Contrastive Learningcited by 115
- 2024ProxyCLIP: Proxy Attention Improves CLIP for Open-Vocabulary Segmentationcited by 111
- 2022Text-Only Training for Image Captioning using Noise-Injected CLIPcited by 91
- 2022Language Models Can See: Plugging Visual Controls in Text Generationcited by 90
- 2023DeCap: Decoding CLIP Latents for Zero-Shot Captioning via Text-Only Trainingcited by 84
- 2022Perceptual Grouping in Contrastive Vision-Language Modelscited by 82
- 2024DINOv2 Meets Text: A Unified Framework for Image- and Pixel-Level Vision-Language Alignmentcited by 79
- 2023Positive-Augmented Contrastive Learning for Image and Video Captioning Evaluationcited by 78
- 2024RegionGPT: Towards Region Understanding Vision Language Modelcited by 71
- 2023SILC: Improving Vision Language Pretraining with Self-Distillationcited by 66
- 2018Show, Control and Tell: A Framework for Generating Controllable and Grounded Captionscited by 65
- 2024Improving fine-grained understanding in image-text pre-trainingcited by 44
- 2024Talking to DINO: Bridging Self-Supervised Vision Backbones with Language for Open-Vocabulary Segmentationcited by 44
- 2024MeaCap: Memory-Augmented Zero-shot Image Captioningcited by 35
- 2023Transferable Decoding with Visual Entities for Zero-Shot Image Captioningcited by 34
- 2019Context and Attribute Grounded Dense Captioningcited by 31
50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.