mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

VirDA: Reusing Backbone for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Visual Reprogramming

arXiv 2510.01660 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2025cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing UDA pipelines fine-tune already well-trained backbone parameters for every new source-and-target pair, resulting in the number of training parameters and storage memory growing linearly with each new pair, and also preventing the reuse of these well-trained backbone parameters. Inspired by recent implications that existing backbones have textural biases, we propose making use of domain-specific textural bias for domain adaptation via visual reprogramming, namely VirDA. Instead of fine-tuning the full backbone, VirDA prepends a domain-specific visual reprogramming layer to the backbone. This layer produces visual prompts that act as an added textural bias to the input image, adapting its "style" to a target domain. To optimize these visual reprogramming layers, we use multiple objective functions that optimize the intra- and inter-domain distribution differences when domain-adapting visual prompts are applied. This process does not require modifying the backbone parameters, allowing the same backbone to be reused across different domains. We evaluate VirDA on Office-31 and obtain 92.8% mean accuracy with only 1.5M trainable parameters. VirDA surpasses PDA, the state-of-the-art parameter-efficient UDA baseline, by +1.6% accuracy while using just 46% of its parameters. Compared with full-backbone fine-tuning, VirDA outperforms CDTrans and FixBi by +0.2% and +1.4%, respectively, while requiring only 1.7% and 2.8% of their trainable parameters. Relative to the strongest current methods (PMTrans and TVT), VirDA uses ~1.7% of their parameters and trades off only 2.2% and 1.1% accuracy, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2025.

Builds on

42 of 55 references.

References · 42

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  4. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  5. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
  6. 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
  7. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  8. 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,323
  9. 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,309
  10. 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,181
  11. 2017CyCADA: Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 1,079
  12. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
30 more
  1. 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 685
  2. 2017Maximum Classifier Discrepancy for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 682
  3. 2016Deep Transfer Learning with Joint Adaptation Networkscited by 609
  4. 2019Bridging Theory and Algorithm for Domain Adaptationcited by 332
  5. 2021Coordinate Attention for Efficient Mobile Network Designcited by 239
  6. 2022Vision GNN: An Image is Worth Graph of Nodescited by 185
  7. 2017Generate To Adapt: Aligning Domains using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 183
  8. 2018Progressive Feature Alignment for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 183
  9. 2016Correlation Alignment for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 146
  10. 2020Towards Discriminability and Diversity: Batch Nuclear-norm Maximization under Label Insufficient Situationscited by 133
  11. 2020Gradually Vanishing Bridge for Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 130
  12. 2021CDTrans: Cross-domain Transformer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 129
  13. 2022Domain Adaptation via Prompt Learningcited by 128
  14. 2021Cross-Domain Adaptive Teacher for Object Detectioncited by 125
  15. 2020FixBi: Bridging Domain Spaces for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 124
  16. 2022Visual Prompt Tuning for Test-time Domain Adaptationcited by 97
  17. 2021Prototypical Cross-domain Self-supervised Learning for Few-shot Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 83
  18. 2021TVT: Transferable Vision Transformer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 81
  19. 2022Safe Self-Refinement for Transformer-based Domain Adaptationcited by 61
  20. 2023Patch-Mix Transformer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: A Game Perspectivecited by 54
  21. 2018Joint Domain Alignment and Discriminative Feature Learning for Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 45
  22. 2023Prompt-based Distribution Alignment for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 44
  23. 2020Domain Conditioned Adaptation Networkcited by 43
  24. 2024Domain-Agnostic Mutual Prompting for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 32
  25. 2021A Bit More Bayesian: Domain-Invariant Learning with Uncertaintycited by 27
  26. 2019Bayesian Uncertainty Matching for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 22
  27. 2024Sample-specific Masks for Visual Reprogramming-based Promptingcited by 16
  28. 2024Bayesian-guided Label Mapping for Visual Reprogrammingcited by 12
  29. 2025Attribute-based Visual Reprogramming for Vision-Language Modelscited by 7
  30. 2024Efficient unsupervised domain adaptation via self-supervised vision transformer and synergistic cross-domain alignmentcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.