mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Re-examining Low Rank adaptation for private LLM fine-tuning

arXiv 2510.01137 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Privacy is a central concern when fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) on sensitive data, and differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) -- which clips per-sample gradients and adds calibrated Gaussian noise -- is the standard tool for formal privacy guarantees. Both theory and practice show that lower-rank models are better suited to DP training, a property especially relevant for LLMs, whose fine-tuning gradients exhibit a strong low-rank structure. Methods such as DP-LoRA exploit this by restricting updates to a low-rank subspace, i.e., retaining only a few non-zero components in the SVD of each layer's gradient. However, we argue that while having few non-zero components is important, the isotropic noise injected by DP-SGD inflates the singular values of the gradient matrix, disrupting their naturally fast decay. In this work, we investigate whether this noise-induced eigenvalue blow-up reduces performance, and show that partially restoring the original singular-value profile significantly improves the sample efficiency of DP-SGD. Experiments on language classification (GLUE benchmark with RoBERTa) and text generation (E2E and DART table-to-text benchmarks with Qwen and Llama models up to 4B parameters) showcase that restoring the fast decay of singular values is a viable strategy for speeding up the DP optimization process, without compromising privacy guarantees.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.

Builds on

25 of 39 references.

References · 25

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  4. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  5. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  6. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  7. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 878
  8. 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 738
  9. 2018A Mean Field View of the Landscape of Two-Layers Neural Networkscited by 466
  10. 2024GaLore: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank Projectioncited by 463
  11. 2021Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private Learnerscited by 412
  12. 2021Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Modelscited by 400
13 more
  1. 2017The E2E Dataset: New Challenges For End-to-End Generationcited by 253
  2. 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 218
  3. 2021Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 199
  4. 2021Numerical Composition of Differential Privacycited by 180
  5. 2020DART: Open-Domain Structured Data Record to Text Generationcited by 145
  6. 2022Differentially Private Optimization on Large Model at Small Costcited by 65
  7. 2022Scalable and Efficient Training of Large Convolutional Neural Networks with Differential Privacycited by 48
  8. 2022When Does Differentially Private Learning Not Suffer in High Dimensions?cited by 48
  9. 2022Differentially Private Bias-Term Fine-tuning of Foundation Modelscited by 48
  10. 2021On the Convergence and Calibration of Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 36
  11. 2024u-μP: The Unit-Scaled Maximal Update Parametrizationcited by 29
  12. 2024DiSK: Differentially Private Optimizer with Simplified Kalman Filter for Noise Reductioncited by 11
  13. 2024DOPPLER: Differentially Private Optimizers with Low-pass Filter for Privacy Noise Reductioncited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.