A Review on Single-Problem Multi-Attempt Heuristic Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In certain real-world optimization scenarios, practitioners are not interested in solving multiple problems but rather in finding the best solution to a single, specific problem. When the computational budget is large relative to the cost of evaluating a candidate solution, multiple heuristic alternatives can be tried to solve the same given problem, each possibly with a different algorithm, parameter configuration, initialization, or stopping criterion. In this practically relevant setting, the sequential selection of which alternative to try next is crucial for efficiently identifying the best possible solution across multiple attempts. However, suitable sequential alternative selection strategies have traditionally been studied separately across different research topics and have not been the exclusive focus of any existing review. As a result, the state-of-the-art remains fragmented for practitioners interested in this setting, with surveys either covering only subsets of relevant strategies or including approaches that rely on assumptions that are not feasible for the single-problem case. This work addresses the identified gap by providing a focused review of single-problem multi-attempt heuristic optimization. It brings together suitable strategies for this setting that have been studied separately through algorithm selection, parameter tuning, multi-start, and resource allocation. These strategies are described using a unified terminology within a common framework, which supports the construction of a taxonomy for systematically organizing and classifying them. The resulting comprehensive review facilitates both the identification and the development of strategies for the single-problem multi-attempt setting in practice.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 108 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2025.
Builds on
21 of 108 references.
References · 21
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 688
- 2018BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scalecited by 466
- 2017Population Based Training of Neural Networkscited by 351
- 2020On Hyperparameter Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms: Theory and Practicecited by 181
- 2021Hyperparameter Optimization: Foundations, Algorithms, Best Practices and Open Challengescited by 143
- 2016Fast Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Hyperparameters on Large Datasetscited by 131
- 2018Automated Algorithm Selection: Survey and Perspectivescited by 111
- 2020Efficient Automatic CASH via Rising Banditscited by 30
- 2019Automated Machine Learning: State-of-The-Art and Open Challengescited by 29
- 2022A Survey of Methods for Automated Algorithm Configurationcited by 29
- 2017Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applicationscited by 22
9 more
- 2023To Switch or not to Switch: Predicting the Benefit of Switching between Algorithms based on Trajectory Featurescited by 9
- 2024Large-scale Benchmarking of Metaphor-based Optimization Heuristicscited by 8
- 2019Sharp Bounds for Genetic Drift in Estimation of Distribution Algorithmscited by 7
- 2014Efficient Multi-Start Strategies for Local Search Algorithmscited by 6
- 2020From Understanding Genetic Drift to a Smart-Restart Parameter-less Compact Genetic Algorithmcited by 4
- 2020Benchmarking for Metaheuristic Black-Box Optimization: Perspectives and Open Challengescited by 4
- 2020An Asymptotically Optimal Multi-Armed Bandit Algorithm and Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 4
- 2020HAMLET -- A Learning Curve-Enabled Multi-Armed Bandit for Algorithm Selectioncited by 2
- 2023On the Fair Comparison of Optimization Algorithms in Different Machinescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.