mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PDE Solvers Should Be Local: Fast, Stable Rollouts with Learned Local Stencils

arXiv 2509.26186 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.NA math.NAcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural operator models for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) often rely on global mixing mechanisms-such as spectral convolutions or attention-which tend to oversmooth sharp local dynamics and introduce high computational cost. We present FINO, a finite-difference-inspired neural architecture that enforces strict locality while retaining multiscale representational power. FINO replaces fixed finite-difference stencil coefficients with learnable convolutional kernels and evolves states via an explicit, learnable time-stepping scheme. A central Local Operator Block leverage a differential stencil layer, a gating mask, and a linear fuse step to construct adaptive derivative-like local features that propagate forward in time. Embedded in an encoder-decoder with a bottleneck, FINO captures fine-grained local structures while preserving interpretability. We establish (i) a composition error bound linking one-step approximation error to stable long-horizon rollouts under a Lipschitz condition, and (ii) a universal approximation theorem for discrete time-stepped PDE dynamics. (iii) Across six benchmarks and a climate modelling task, FINO achieves up to 44% lower error and up to around 2× speedups over state-of-the-art operator-learning baselines, demonstrating that strict locality with learnable time-stepping yields an accurate and scalable foundation for neural PDE solvers.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2025.

Builds on

20 of 31 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  3. 2020Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equationscited by 734
  4. 2022PDEBENCH: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 413
  5. 2022Message Passing Neural PDE Solverscited by 386
  6. 2023GNOT: A General Neural Operator Transformer for Operator Learningcited by 336
  7. 2024Transolver: A Fast Transformer Solver for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 326
  8. 2017PDE-Net: Learning PDEs from Datacited by 311
  9. 2021U-FNO -- An enhanced Fourier neural operator-based deep-learning model for multiphase flowcited by 297
  10. 2022Transformer for Partial Differential Equations' Operator Learningcited by 283
  11. 2021Factorized Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 249
  12. 2023Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEscited by 214
8 more
  1. 2018PDE-Net 2.0: Learning PDEs from Data with A Numeric-Symbolic Hybrid Deep Networkcited by 210
  2. 2022Learning Operators with Coupled Attentioncited by 90
  3. 2022Wavelet neural operator: a neural operator for parametric partial differential equationscited by 78
  4. 2024Neural Operators with Localized Integral and Differential Kernelscited by 62
  5. 2022Real-time high-resolution CO2 geological storage prediction using nested Fourier neural operatorscited by 47
  6. 2024HAMLET: Graph Transformer Neural Operator for Partial Differential Equationscited by 24
  7. 2024Mamba Neural Operator: Who Wins? Transformers vs. State-Space Models for PDEscited by 16
  8. 2023On the locality of local neural operator in learning fluid dynamicscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.