mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Importance Sampling for Multi-Negative Multimodal Direct Preference Optimization

arXiv 2509.25717 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2025cs.CV cs.CL cs.LGcited by 5

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has recently been extended from text-only models to vision-language models. However, existing methods rely on oversimplified pairwise comparisons, generating a single negative image via basic perturbations or similarity-based retrieval, which fail to capture the complex nature of multimodal preferences, inducing optimization bias and hallucinations. To address this issue, we propose MISP-DPO, the first framework to incorporate multiple, semantically diverse negative images in multimodal DPO via the Plackett-Luce model. Our method embeds prompts and candidate images in CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining) space and applies a sparse autoencoder to uncover semantic deviations into interpretable factors. Negative samples are selected based on reconstruction difficulty, semantic deviation from the positive, and mutual diversity, yielding broader and more informative supervision. To handle multi-negative comparisons, we adopt a Plackett-Luce objective and introduce an importance sampling strategy that improves training efficiency. Experiments across five diverse benchmarks demonstrate that MISP-DPO consistently improves multimodal alignment over prior methods, validating the effectiveness of semantic-aware, multi-negative sampling in preference-based learning.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 33 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2025.

Builds on

33 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Re-Align: Aligning Vision Language Models via Retrieval-Augmented Direct Preference Optimization18 Feb
  2. 2024Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling6 Dec
  3. 2024Modality-Fair Preference Optimization for Trustworthy MLLM Alignment20 Oct
  4. 2024mDPO: Conditional Preference Optimization for Multimodal Large Language Models17 Jun
  5. 2024MM-LLMs: Recent Advances in MultiModal Large Language Models24 Jan
  6. 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs11 Jan
  7. 2023Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHF25 Sep
  8. 2023SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehension30 Jul

Other references · 25

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  5. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  6. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  7. 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,729
  8. 2023HallusionBench: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 583
  9. 2024VLMEvalKit: An Open-Source Toolkit for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Modelscited by 455
  10. 2023RLHF-V: Towards Trustworthy MLLMs via Behavior Alignment from Fine-grained Correctional Human Feedbackcited by 412
  11. 2023SugarCrepe: Fixing Hackable Benchmarks for Vision-Language Compositionalitycited by 243
  12. 2024Direct Preference Optimization with an Offsetcited by 122
13 more
  1. 2022Disentangled Representation Learningcited by 112
  2. 2024WildVision: Evaluating Vision-Language Models in the Wild with Human Preferencescited by 76
  3. 2023Learning Concise and Descriptive Attributes for Visual Recognitioncited by 73
  4. 2024Enhancing Large Vision Language Models with Self-Training on Image Comprehensioncited by 70
  5. 2024On Softmax Direct Preference Optimization for Recommendationcited by 64
  6. 2024Direct Multi-Turn Preference Optimization for Language Agentscited by 64
  7. 2023Text encoders bottleneck compositionality in contrastive vision-language modelscited by 34
  8. 2025CHiP: Cross-modal Hierarchical Direct Preference Optimization for Multimodal LLMscited by 31
  9. 2023Enhancing Multimodal Compositional Reasoning of Visual Language Models with Generative Negative Miningcited by 25
  10. 2024The Hard Positive Truth about Vision-Language Compositionalitycited by 22
  11. 2024Iterated Learning Improves Compositionality in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 17
  12. 2025Symmetrical Visual Contrastive Optimization: Aligning Vision-Language Models with Minimal Contrastive Imagescited by 14
  13. 2025AdPO: Enhancing the Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Models with Preference Optimizationcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026PEA-DPO: Perception-Enhanced Alignment Direct Preference Optimization for MLLMs Alignment
  2. 2024MIA-DPO: Multi-Image Augmented Direct Preference Optimization For Large Vision-Language Models
  3. 2026Uncertainty-Aware Exploratory Direct Preference Optimization for Multimodal Large Language Models
  4. 2024Scalable Ranked Preference Optimization for Text-to-Image Generation
  5. 2026Learning from Noisy Preferences: A Semi-Supervised Learning Approach to Direct Preference Optimization
  6. 2025FocalPO: Enhancing Preference Optimizing by Focusing on Correct Preference Rankings
  7. 2025Dual Caption Preference Optimization for Diffusion Models
  8. 2025ASPO: Adaptive Sentence-Level Preference Optimization for Fine-Grained Multimodal Reasoning