Lightweight and Robust Federated Data Valuation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning (FL) faces persistent robustness challenges due to non-IID data distributions and adversarial client behavior. A promising mitigation strategy is contribution evaluation, which enables adaptive aggregation by quantifying each client's utility to the global model. However, state-of-the-art Shapley-value-based approaches incur high computational overhead due to repeated model reweighting and inference, which limits their scalability. We propose FedIF, a novel FL aggregation framework that leverages trajectory-based influence estimation to efficiently compute client contributions. FedIF adapts decentralized FL by introducing normalized and smoothed influence scores computed from lightweight gradient operations on client updates and a public validation set. Theoretical analysis demonstrates that FedIF yields a tighter bound on one-step global loss change under noisy conditions. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-10 and Fashion-MNIST show that FedIF achieves robustness comparable to or exceeding SV-based methods in the presence of label noise, gradient noise, and adversarial samples, while reducing aggregation overhead by up to 450x. Ablation studies confirm the effectiveness of FedIF's design choices, including local weight normalization and influence smoothing. Our results establish FedIF as a practical, theoretically grounded, and scalable alternative to Shapley-value-based approaches for efficient and robust FL in real-world deployments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.
Builds on
27 of 41 references.
References · 27
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
- 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,108
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
- 2021Model-Contrastive Federated Learningcited by 766
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
- 2018Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Littlecited by 605
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
15 more
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 493
- 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 346
- 2019Robust Aggregation for Federated Learningcited by 317
- 2019SCAFFOLD: Stochastic Controlled Averaging for Federated Learningcited by 175
- 2021Federated Learning for Open Bankingcited by 141
- 2020A Principled Approach to Data Valuation for Federated Learningcited by 127
- 2021GTG-Shapley: Efficient and Accurate Participant Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learningcited by 74
- 2020Fast-Convergent Federated Learning with Adaptive Weightingcited by 67
- 2022FedCorr: Multi-Stage Federated Learning for Label Noise Correctioncited by 61
- 2023FedNoRo: Towards Noise-Robust Federated Learning by Addressing Class Imbalance and Label Noise Heterogeneitycited by 33
- 2023FS-Real: Towards Real-World Cross-Device Federated Learningcited by 22
- 2024Redefining Contributions: Shapley-Driven Federated Learningcited by 17
- 2023FedNoisy: Federated Noisy Label Learning Benchmarkcited by 11
- 2023Exploring adversarial attacks in federated learning for medical imagingcited by 8
- 2022A Practical Cross-Device Federated Learning Framework over 5G Networkscited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.