mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning in an Echo Chamber: Online Learning with Replay Adversary

arXiv 2509.25135 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As machine learning systems increasingly train on self-annotated data, they risk reinforcing errors and becoming echo chambers of their own beliefs. We model this phenomenon by introducing a learning-theoretic framework: Online Learning in the Replay Setting. In round t, the learner outputs a hypothesis hatht; the adversary then reveals either the true label f^ast(xt) or a replayed label hathi(xt) from an earlier round i < t. A mistake is counted only when the true label is shown, yet classical algorithms such as the SOA or the halving algorithm are easily misled by the replayed errors. We introduce the Extended Threshold dimension, ExThD(H), and prove matching upper and lower bounds that make ExThD(H) the exact measure of learnability in this model. A closure-based learner makes at most ExThD(H) mistakes against any adaptive adversary, and no algorithm can perform better. For stochastic adversaries, we prove a similar bound for every intersection-closed class. The replay setting is provably harder than the classical mistake bound setting: some classes have constant Littlestone dimension but arbitrarily large ExThD(H). Proper learning exhibits an even sharper separation: a class is properly learnable under replay if and only if it is (almost) intersection-closed. Otherwise, every proper learner suffers Omega(T) errors, whereas our improper algorithm still achieves the ExThD(H) bound. These results give the first tight analysis of learning against replay adversaries, based on new results for closure-type algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.

Builds on

20 of 46 references.

References · 20

  1. 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,028
  2. 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 852
  3. 2019Self-labelling via simultaneous clustering and representation learningcited by 528
  4. 2023The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forgetcited by 356
  5. 2023Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADcited by 250
  6. 2023Artificial Artificial Artificial Intelligence: Crowd Workers Widely Use Large Language Models for Text Production Taskscited by 103
  7. 2021Outside the Echo Chamber: Optimizing the Performative Riskcited by 96
  8. 2018Private PAC learning implies finite Littlestone dimensioncited by 74
  9. 2023Visual Program Distillation: Distilling Tools and Programmatic Reasoning into Vision-Language Modelscited by 66
  10. 2014Minimax Analysis of Active Learningcited by 61
  11. 2020Proper Learning, Helly Number, and an Optimal SVM Boundcited by 53
  12. 2023Performative Prediction: Past and Futurecited by 53
8 more
  1. 2024Are We in the AI-Generated Text World Already? Quantifying and Monitoring AIGT on Social Mediacited by 35
  2. 2015Refined Error Bounds for Several Learning Algorithmscited by 25
  3. 2021Online Learning with Simple Predictors and a Combinatorial Characterization of Minimax in 0/1 Gamescited by 18
  4. 20152 Notes on Classes with Vapnik-Chervonenkis Dimension 1cited by 12
  5. 2023Adversarial Resilience in Sequential Prediction via Abstentioncited by 11
  6. 2017The Relationship Between Agnostic Selective Classification Active Learning and the Disagreement Coefficientcited by 6
  7. 2022Unlabelled Sample Compression Schemes for Intersection-Closed Classes and Extremal Classescited by 5
  8. 2025An tildeOptimal Differentially Private Learner for Concept Classes with VC Dimension 1cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.