MarS-FM: Generative Modeling of Molecular Dynamics via Markov State Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Molecular Dynamics (MD) is a powerful computational microscope for probing protein functions. However, the need for fine-grained integration and the long timescales of biomolecular events make MD computationally expensive. To address this, several generative models have been proposed to generate surrogate trajectories at lower cost. Yet, these models typically learn a fixed-lag transition density, causing the training signal to be dominated by frequent but uninformative transitions. We introduce a new class of generative models, MSM Emulators, which instead learn to sample transitions across discrete states defined by an underlying Markov State Model (MSM). We instantiate this class with Markov Space Flow Matching (MarS-FM), whose sampling offers more than two orders of magnitude speedup compared to implicit- or explicit-solvent MD simulations. We benchmark Mars-FM ability to reproduce MD statistics through structural observables such as RMSD, radius of gyration, and secondary structure content. Our evaluation spans protein domains (up to 500 residues) with significant chemical and structural diversity, including unfolding events, and enforces strict sequence dissimilarity between training and test sets to assess generalization. Across all metrics, MarS-FM outperforms existing methods, often by a substantial margin.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.
Builds on
27 of 67 references.
References · 27
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
- 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 6,054
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
- 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
- 2022Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolantscited by 995
- 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 939
- 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transportcited by 879
- 2021E(n) Equivariant Normalizing Flowscited by 165
- 2024AlphaFold Meets Flow Matching for Generating Protein Ensemblescited by 110
15 more
- 2020Targeted free energy estimation via learned mappingscited by 67
- 2023Timewarp: Transferable Acceleration of Molecular Dynamics by Learning Time-Coarsened Dynamicscited by 66
- 2023EigenFold: Generative Protein Structure Prediction with Diffusion Modelscited by 63
- 2021Smooth Normalizing Flowscited by 53
- 2024Generative Modeling of Molecular Dynamics Trajectoriescited by 51
- 2024Transferable Boltzmann Generatorscited by 46
- 2021Deeptime: a Python library for machine learning dynamical models from time series datacited by 38
- 2025Scalable Equilibrium Sampling with Sequential Boltzmann Generatorscited by 38
- 2022Machine Learning Coarse-Grained Potentials of Protein Thermodynamicscited by 37
- 2023SE(3) Equivariant Augmented Coupling Flowscited by 37
- 2022Simulate Time-integrated Coarse-grained Molecular Dynamics with Multi-Scale Graph Networkscited by 23
- 2016Variational Koopman models: slow collective variables and molecular kinetics from short off-equilibrium simulationscited by 18
- 2024Structure Language Models for Protein Conformation Generationcited by 17
- 2024EquiJump: Protein Dynamics Simulation via SO(3)-Equivariant Stochastic Interpolantscited by 16
- 2023Implicit Transfer Operator Learning: Multiple Time-Resolution Surrogates for Molecular Dynamicscited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026Generative Modeling in Protein Design: Neural Representations, Conditional Generation, and Evaluation Standardscited by 1
- 2026Learning Structure, Energy, and Dynamics: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Protein Dynamicscited by 1
- 2026Autoregressive Boltzmann Generatorscited by 1
- 2026Learning Topological Representations of Protein Structure and Dynamicscited by 0
- 2026AquaGen: Scaling generative models to molecular dynamics precision on thousands of atomscited by 0
- 2026FLARE: Flow Matching with Local Axis-Angle Representations for Stochastic Micromagnetic Evolutioncited by 0
- 2026FLARE: Flow Matching with Local Axis-Angle Representations for Stochastic Micromagnetic Evolution28 Sep 2026
- 2026AquaGen: Scaling generative models to molecular dynamics precision on thousands of atoms3 Jul 2026
- 2026Autoregressive Boltzmann Generators25 Jun 2026
- 2026Learning Topological Representations of Protein Structure and Dynamics2 Jun 2026
- 2026Learning Structure, Energy, and Dynamics: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Protein Dynamics28 Apr 2026
- 2026Generative Modeling in Protein Design: Neural Representations, Conditional Generation, and Evaluation Standards27 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Atomic Trajectory Modeling with State Space Models for Biomolecular Dynamics
- 2025ConfRover: Simultaneous Modeling of Protein Conformation and Dynamics via Autoregression
- 2026Unified Biomolecular Trajectory Generation via Pretrained Variational Bridge
- 2026Minimal-Action Discrete Schr"odinger Bridge Matching for Peptide Sequence Design
- 2024Generalized Flow Matching for Transition Dynamics Modeling
- 2024F3low: Frame-to-Frame Coarse-grained Molecular Dynamics with SE(3) Guided Flow Matching
- 2024Generative Flows on Discrete State-Spaces: Enabling Multimodal Flows with Applications to Protein Co-Design
- 2026Scalable Spatio-Temporal SE(3) Diffusion for Long-Horizon Protein Dynamics