Building Benchmarks from the Ground Up: Community-Centered Evaluation of LLMs in Healthcare Chatbot Settings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are typically evaluated through general or domain-specific benchmarks testing capabilities that often lack grounding in the lived realities of end users. Critical domains such as healthcare require evaluations that extend beyond artificial or simulated tasks to reflect the everyday needs, cultural practices, and nuanced contexts of communities. We propose Samiksha, a community-driven evaluation pipeline co-created with civil-society organizations (CSOs) and community members. Our approach enables scalable, automated benchmarking through a culturally aware, community-driven pipeline in which community feedback informs what to evaluate, how the benchmark is built, and how outputs are scored. We demonstrate this approach in the health domain in India. Our analysis highlights how current multilingual LLMs address nuanced community health queries, while also offering a scalable pathway for contextually grounded and inclusive LLM evaluation.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.
Builds on
46 of 84 references.
References · 46
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
- 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,356
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,242
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 870
- 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 465
- 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 420
- 2023LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 336
- 2023MEGA: Multilingual Evaluation of Generative AIcited by 293
34 more
- 2022Is GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator?cited by 208
- 2024Global MMLU: Understanding and Addressing Cultural and Linguistic Biases in Multilingual Evaluationcited by 191
- 2024Aya Dataset: An Open-Access Collection for Multilingual Instruction Tuningcited by 177
- 2024BLEnD: A Benchmark for LLMs on Everyday Knowledge in Diverse Cultures and Languagescited by 173
- 2023IndicTrans2: Towards High-Quality and Accessible Machine Translation Models for all 22 Scheduled Indian Languagescited by 152
- 2022Power to the People? Opportunities and Challenges for Participatory AIcited by 138
- 2023ExpertQA: Expert-Curated Questions and Attributed Answerscited by 97
- 2023Are Large Language Model-based Evaluators the Solution to Scaling Up Multilingual Evaluation?cited by 88
- 2023The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practicecited by 87
- 2025Synthetic Data Generation Using Large Language Models: Advances in Text and Codecited by 61
- 2025Randomness, Not Representation: The Unreliability of Evaluating Cultural Alignment in LLMscited by 54
- 2023Facilitating Self-Guided Mental Health Interventions Through Human-Language Model Interaction: A Case Study of Cognitive Restructuringcited by 53
- 2024CultureLLM: Incorporating Cultural Differences into Large Language Modelscited by 50
- 2024Explaining Length Bias in LLM-Based Preference Evaluationscited by 49
- 2024PARIKSHA: A Large-Scale Investigation of Human-LLM Evaluator Agreement on Multilingual and Multi-Cultural Datacited by 37
- 2023Unveiling Gender Bias in Terms of Profession Across LLMs: Analyzing and Addressing Sociological Implicationscited by 29
- 2025An Evaluation of Cultural Value Alignment in LLMcited by 28
- 2024MILU: A Multi-task Indic Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 27
- 2024AfriMed-QA: A Pan-African, Multi-Specialty, Medical Question-Answering Benchmark Datasetcited by 26
- 2024CulturePark: Boosting Cross-cultural Understanding in Large Language Modelscited by 24
- 2025Multiple LLM Agents Debate for Equitable Cultural Alignmentcited by 21
- 2024Wikibench: Community-Driven Data Curation for AI Evaluation on Wikipediacited by 18
- 2025The Case for "Thick Evaluations" of Cultural Representation in AIcited by 17
- 2022The Data-Production Dispositifcited by 16
- 2024Towards Geographic Inclusion in the Evaluation of Text-to-Image Modelscited by 16
- 2025Disentangling Language and Culture for Evaluating Multilingual Large Language Modelscited by 16
- 2024Farmer.Chat: Scaling AI-Powered Agricultural Services for Smallholder Farmerscited by 13
- 2025"Kya family planning after marriage hoti hai?": Integrating Cultural Sensitivity in an LLM Chatbot for Reproductive Healthcited by 5
- 2024Cracking the Code: Multi-domain LLM Evaluation on Real-World Professional Exams in Indonesiacited by 4
- 2024HEALTH-PARIKSHA: Assessing RAG Models for Health Chatbots in Real-World Multilingual Settingscited by 4
- 2025The Human Labour of Data Work: Capturing Cultural Diversity through World Wide Dishescited by 4
- 2023Culturally Responsive Artificial Intelligence -- Problems, Challenges and Solutionscited by 3
- 2024ASHABot: An LLM-Powered Chatbot to Support the Informational Needs of Community Health Workerscited by 3
- 2025DICE: A Framework for Dimensional and Contextual Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2026The Geometry of LLM-as-Judge: Why Inter-LLM Consensus Is Not Human Alignmentcited by 3
- 2026Opening LLM Judges: Recovering Preference Signals Beyond the Final Verdictcited by 1
- 2025Towards Real-World Validity in Generative AI Benchmarks: Understanding and Designing Domain-Centered Evaluations for Journalism Practitionerscited by 0
- 2026How Value Induction Reshapes LLM Behaviourcited by 0
- 2026Pluralis v0.1: Towards a Multicultural, Multimodal, Multilingual Benchmark for AI Risk and Reliabilitycited by 0
- 2026Opening LLM Judges: Recovering Preference Signals Beyond the Final Verdict26 Sep 2026
- 2026Pluralis v0.1: Towards a Multicultural, Multimodal, Multilingual Benchmark for AI Risk and Reliability7 Jul 2026
- 2026The Geometry of LLM-as-Judge: Why Inter-LLM Consensus Is Not Human Alignment2 Jun 2026
- 2026How Value Induction Reshapes LLM Behaviour8 May 2026
- 2025Towards Real-World Validity in Generative AI Benchmarks: Understanding and Designing Domain-Centered Evaluations for Journalism Practitioners30 Sep 2025