mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automatic selection of primary studies in systematic reviews with evolutionary rule-based classification

arXiv 2509.23981 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2025cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Searching, filtering and analysing scientific literature are time-consuming tasks when performing a systematic literature review. With the rise of artificial intelligence, some steps in the review process are progressively being automated. In particular, machine learning for automatic paper selection can greatly reduce the effort required to identify relevant literature in scientific databases. We propose an evolutionary machine learning approach, called ourmodel, to automatically determine whether a paper retrieved from a literature search process is relevant. ourmodel builds an interpretable rule-based classifier using grammar-guided genetic programming. The use of a grammar to define the syntax and the structure of the rules allows ourmodel to easily combine the usual textual information with other bibliometric data not considered by state-of-the-art methods. Our experiments demonstrate that it is possible to generate accurate classifiers without impairing interpretability and using configurable information sources not supported so far.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2025.

Builds on

4 of 34 references.

References · 4

  1. 2020Open Source Software for Efficient and Transparent Reviewscited by 35
  2. 2017FAST2: an Intelligent Assistant for Finding Relevant Paperscited by 6
  3. 2024GEML: A Grammar-based Evolutionary Machine Learning Approach for Design-Pattern Detectioncited by 3
  4. 2025Can Machine Learning Support the Selection of Studies for Systematic Literature Review Updates?cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.