FAST2: an Intelligent Assistant for Finding Relevant Papers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Literature reviews are essential for any researcher trying to keep up to date with the burgeoning software engineering literature. FAST2 is a novel tool for reducing the effort required for conducting literature reviews by assisting the researchers to find the next promising paper to read (among a set of unread papers). This paper describes FAST2 and tests it on four large software engineering literature reviews conducted by Wahono (2015), Hall (2012), Radjenovi'c (2013) and Kitchenham (2017). We find that FAST2 is a faster and robust tool to assist researcher finding relevant SE papers which can compensate for the errors made by humans during the review process. The effectiveness of FAST2 can be attributed to three key innovations: (1) a novel way of applying external domain knowledge (a simple two or three keyword search) to guide the initial selection of papers---which helps to find relevant research papers faster with less variances; (2) an estimator of the number of remaining relevant papers yet to be found---which in practical settings can be used to decide if the reviewing process needs to be terminated; (3) a novel self-correcting classification algorithm---automatically corrects itself, in cases where the researcher wrongly classifies a paper.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 May 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.
6 papers.
- 2024Artificial Intelligence for Literature Reviews: Opportunities and Challengescited by 30
- 2021What are the attackers doing now? Automating cyber threat intelligence extraction from text on pace with the changing threat landscape: A surveycited by 14
- 2024Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literaturecited by 11
- 2025Automatic selection of primary studies in systematic reviews with evolutionary rule-based classificationcited by 1
- 2025Computational Measurement of Political Positions: A Review of Text-Based Ideal Point Estimation Algorithmscited by 1
- 2025NeuroLit Navigator: A Neurosymbolic Approach to Scholarly Article Searches for Systematic Reviewscited by 0
- 2025Computational Measurement of Political Positions: A Review of Text-Based Ideal Point Estimation Algorithms17 Nov 2025
- 2025Automatic selection of primary studies in systematic reviews with evolutionary rule-based classification28 Sep 2025
- 2025NeuroLit Navigator: A Neurosymbolic Approach to Scholarly Article Searches for Systematic Reviews1 Mar 2025
- 2024Artificial Intelligence for Literature Reviews: Opportunities and Challenges13 Feb 2024
- 2024Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature13 Jan 2024
- 2021What are the attackers doing now? Automating cyber threat intelligence extraction from text on pace with the changing threat landscape: A survey14 Sep 2021