Dynamic Orthogonal Continual Fine-tuning for Mitigating Catastrophic Forgettings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Catastrophic forgetting remains a critical challenge in continual learning for large language models (LLMs), where models struggle to retain performance on historical tasks when fine-tuning on new sequential data without access to past datasets. In this paper, we first reveal that the drift of functional directions during the fine-tuning process is a key reason why existing regularization-based methods fail in long-term LLM continual learning. To address this, we propose Dynamic Orthogonal Continual (DOC) fine-tuning, a novel approach that tracks the drift of these functional directions and dynamically updates them during the fine-tuning process. Furthermore, by adjusting the gradients of new task parameters to be orthogonal to the tracked historical function directions, our method mitigates interference between new and old tasks. Extensive experiments on various LLM continual learning benchmarks demonstrate that this approach outperforms prior methods, effectively reducing catastrophic forgetting and providing a robust tool for continuous LLM fine-tuning. Our code is available at https://github.com/meloxxxxxx/DOC.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2025.
Builds on
25 of 42 references.
References · 25
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
- 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 723
- 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 671
- 2019Orthogonal Gradient Descent for Continual Learningcited by 369
13 more
- 2023Orthogonal Subspace Learning for Language Model Continual Learningcited by 312
- 2023Progressive Prompts: Continual Learning for Language Modelscited by 197
- 2019Episodic Memory in Lifelong Language Learningcited by 188
- 2024Continual Learning for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 147
- 2023The Quantization Model of Neural Scalingcited by 138
- 2021LFPT5: A Unified Framework for Lifelong Few-shot Language Learning Based on Prompt Tuning of T5cited by 104
- 2021Continual Learning for Text Classification with Information Disentanglement Based Regularizationcited by 86
- 2023Exploring the Benefits of Training Expert Language Models over Instruction Tuningcited by 80
- 2024Towards Lifelong Learning of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 64
- 2022Interpreting Neural Networks through the Polytope Lenscited by 33
- 2024Scalable Language Model with Generalized Continual Learningcited by 28
- 2024Rehearsal-Free Modular and Compositional Continual Learning for Language Modelscited by 27
- 2015Online Principal Component Analysis in High Dimension: Which Algorithm to Choose?cited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.