From Personal to Collective: On the Role of Local and Global Memory in LLM Personalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language model (LLM) personalization aims to tailor model behavior to individual users based on their historical interactions. However, its effectiveness is often hindered by two key challenges: the textitcold-start problem, where users with limited history provide insufficient context for accurate personalization, and the textitbiasing problem, where users with abundant but skewed history cause the model to overfit to narrow preferences. We identify both issues as symptoms of a common underlying limitation, i.e., the inability to model collective knowledge across users. To address this, we propose a local-global memory framework (LoGo) that combines the personalized local memory with a collective global memory that captures shared interests across the population. To reconcile discrepancies between these two memory sources, we introduce a mediator module designed to resolve conflicts between local and global signals. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that LoGo consistently improves personalization quality by both warming up cold-start users and mitigating biased predictions. These results highlight the importance of incorporating collective knowledge to enhance LLM personalization.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2025.
Builds on
15 of 34 references.
References · 15
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Mergingcited by 280
- 2024Personalized Language Modeling from Personalized Human Feedbackcited by 132
- 2023Do LLMs Understand User Preferences? Evaluating LLMs On User Rating Predictioncited by 116
- 2024Optimization Methods for Personalizing Large Language Models through Retrieval Augmentationcited by 99
- 2023Pearl: Personalizing Large Language Model Writing Assistants with Generation-Calibrated Retrieverscited by 92
- 2024RAG vs Fine-tuning: Pipelines, Tradeoffs, and a Case Study on Agriculturecited by 81
- 2024RLHF from Heterogeneous Feedback via Personalization and Preference Aggregationcited by 74
- 2024Personalized Pieces: Efficient Personalized Large Language Models through Collaborative Effortscited by 74
3 more
- 2024A Review of Modern Recommender Systems Using Generative Models (Gen-RecSys)cited by 58
- 2024Persona-DB: Efficient Large Language Model Personalization for Response Prediction with Collaborative Data Refinementcited by 49
- 2023Teach LLMs to Personalize -- An Approach inspired by Writing Educationcited by 48
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.