Dual-Space Smoothness for Robust and Balanced LLM Unlearning
On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning
Abstract (arXiv)
As large language models evolve, Machine Unlearning has emerged to address growing concerns around user privacy, copyright infringement, and overall safety. Yet state-of-the-art (SOTA) unlearning methods often suffer from catastrophic forgetting and metric imbalance, for example, by over-optimizing one objective (e.g., unlearning effectiveness, utility preservation, or privacy protection) at the expense of others. In addition, small perturbations in the representation or parameter space can be exploited by relearn and jailbreak attacks. To address these challenges, we propose PRISM, a unified framework that enforces dual-space smoothness in representation and parameter spaces to improve robustness and balance unlearning metrics. PRISM consists of two smoothness optimization stages: (i) a representation space stage that employs a robustly trained probe to defend against jailbreak attacks, and (ii) a parameter-space stage that decouples retain-forget gradient conflicts, reduces imbalance, and smooths the parameter space to mitigate relearning attacks. Extensive experiments on WMDP and MUSE, across conversational-dialogue and continuous-text settings, show that PRISM outperforms SOTA baselines under multiple attacks while achieving a better balance among key metrics.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 61 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2025.
Builds on
61 of 74 references.
Closest ancestors · 18
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Distillation Robustifies Unlearning6 Jun
- 2025Towards LLM Unlearning Resilient to Relearning Attacks: A Sharpness-Aware Minimization Perspective and Beyond7 Feb
- 2024Catastrophic Failure of LLM Unlearning via Quantization21 Oct
- 2024Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearning9 Oct
- 2024Towards Robust Knowledge Unlearning: An Adversarial Framework for Assessing and Improving Unlearning Robustness in Large Language Models20 Aug
- 2024Machine Unlearning in Generative AI: A Survey30 Jul
- 2024MUSE: Machine Unlearning Six-Way Evaluation for Language Models8 Jul
- 2024Large Language Model Unlearning via Embedding-Corrupted Prompts12 Jun
- 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr
- 2024Towards Safer Large Language Models through Machine Unlearning15 Feb
- 2024Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models13 Feb
- 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
6 more
- 2023Large Language Model Unlearning14 Oct
- 2023In-Context Unlearning: Language Models as Few Shot Unlearners11 Oct
- 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMs3 Oct
- 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Models4 Oct
- 2022Continual Learning and Private Unlearning24 Mar
- 2021Unrolling SGD: Understanding Factors Influencing Machine Unlearning27 Sep
Other references · 43
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
- 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,154
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
31 more
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 966
- 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Modelscited by 785
- 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 509
- 2024Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attackscited by 486
- 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 465
- 2024Great, Now Write an Article About That: The Crescendo Multi-Turn LLM Jailbreak Attackcited by 390
- 2023Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Modelscited by 387
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Uglycited by 387
- 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 383
- 2024Improving Alignment and Robustness with Circuit Breakerscited by 322
- 2024ShieldGemma: Generative AI Content Moderation Based on Gemmacited by 243
- 2024SORRY-Bench: Systematically Evaluating Large Language Model Safety Refusalcited by 240
- 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
- 2024Latent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMscited by 173
- 2022Towards Efficient and Scalable Sharpness-Aware Minimizationcited by 129
- 2024Efficient Adversarial Training in LLMs with Continuous Attackscited by 113
- 2023Copyright Violations and Large Language Modelscited by 108
- 2023From CLIP to DINO: Visual Encoders Shout in Multi-modal Large Language Modelscited by 98
- 2024Towards Understanding Jailbreak Attacks in LLMs: A Representation Space Analysiscited by 64
- 2023Privacy Issues in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 60
- 2023LatestEval: Addressing Data Contamination in Language Model Evaluation through Dynamic and Time-Sensitive Test Constructioncited by 58
- 2024BEEAR: Embedding-based Adversarial Removal of Safety Backdoors in Instruction-tuned Language Modelscited by 58
- 2025JBShield: Defending Large Language Models from Jailbreak Attacks through Activated Concept Analysis and Manipulationcited by 54
- 2025Improving LLM Safety Alignment with Dual-Objective Optimizationcited by 43
- 2024Copyright Traps for Large Language Modelscited by 37
- 2025Towards Trustworthy Retrieval Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 30
- 2024On the Duality Between Sharpness-Aware Minimization and Adversarial Trainingcited by 24
- 2024JailbreakLens: Interpreting Jailbreak Mechanism in the Lens of Representation and Circuitcited by 22
- 2024From Text to Transformation: A Comprehensive Review of Large Language Models' Versatilitycited by 19
- 2023Sharpness-Aware Minimization Alone can Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 14
- 2024Neglected Hessian component explains mysteries in Sharpness regularizationcited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025OpenUnlearning: Accelerating LLM Unlearning via Unified Benchmarking of Methods and Metrics
- 2026Robust LLM Unlearning Against Relearning Attacks: The Minor Components in Representations Matter
- 2025LLM Unlearning using Gradient Ratio-Based Influence Estimation and Noise Injection
- 2026Unlearning in LLMs: Methods, Evaluation, and Open Challenges
- 2024Protecting Privacy Through Approximating Optimal Parameters for Sequence Unlearning in Language Models
- 2025Machine Unlearning Meets Adversarial Robustness via Constrained Interventions on LLMs
- 2025Downgrade to Upgrade: Optimizer Simplification Enhances Robustness in LLM Unlearning
- 2025GRU: Mitigating the Trade-off between Unlearning and Retention for LLMs