Causally-Enhanced Reinforcement Policy Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) trained with reinforcement objectives often achieve superficially correct answers via shortcut strategies, pairing correct outputs with spurious or unfaithful reasoning and degrading under small causal perturbations. We introduce Causally-Enhanced Policy Optimization (CE-PO), a drop-in reward-shaping framework that augments policy optimization with a differentiable proxy for causal coherence along the generation pathway from prompt (Z) to rationale (X) to answer (Y). CE-PO estimates model-internal influence with Jacobian-based sensitivities, counterfactually hardens these signals to suppress nuisance cues, and fuses the resulting coherence score with task-accuracy feedback via a Minkowski (power-mean) combiner, exposing a single tunable between accuracy and coherence trade-off. The unified reward integrates with PPO/GRPO without architectural changes. Across reasoning benchmarks and causal stress tests, CE-PO reduces reward hacking and unfaithful chain-of-thought while improving robustness to correlation-causation flips and light counterfactual edits, all at near-parity accuracy. Experimental results across 4 datasets show that CE-PO improves accuracy over baselines by 5.49% on average (up to 9.58%), while improving robustness to correlation-causation flips and light counterfactual edits.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2025.
Builds on
48 of 66 references.
References · 48
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
36 more
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
- 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,156
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,095
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 1,040
- 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 855
- 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 681
- 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 455
- 2023LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 336
- 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 294
- 2013Direct and Indirect Effectscited by 280
- 2020The Risks of Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 262
- 2014A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 242
- 2024How to use and interpret activation patchingcited by 214
- 2023Can Large Language Models Infer Causation from Correlation?cited by 146
- 2024Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization in Direct Alignment Algorithmscited by 143
- 2024Language Models Learn to Mislead Humans via RLHFcited by 124
- 2021Does Invariant Risk Minimization Capture Invariance?cited by 116
- 2023LLMs as Narcissistic Evaluators: When Ego Inflates Evaluation Scorescited by 90
- 2024Feedback Loops With Language Models Drive In-Context Reward Hackingcited by 77
- 2017Reinforcement Learning with a Corrupted Reward Channelcited by 70
- 2020Explaining The Efficacy of Counterfactually Augmented Datacited by 65
- 2018Orthogonal Random Forest for Causal Inferencecited by 51
- 2025Evolving Language Models without Labels: Majority Drives Selection, Novelty Promotes Variationcited by 45
- 2025Beyond Reward Hacking: Causal Rewards for Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 42
- 2025Unveiling Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models: Reality or Mirage?cited by 38
- 2024Spontaneous Reward Hacking in Iterative Self-Refinementcited by 26
- 2024Do Influence Functions Work on Large Language Models?cited by 20
- 2024CausalEval: Towards Better Causal Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 13
- 2024CausalGraph2LLM: Evaluating LLMs for Causal Queriescited by 12
- 2025Lessons from Training Grounded LLMs with Verifiable Rewardscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025The Policy Cliff: A Theoretical Analysis of Reward-Policy Maps in Large Language Models
- 2026Rationale-Guided Policy Optimization: Learning to Reason with Adaptive Rationale Scaffolding
- 2026Unlocking the Critic: Reward-Free Policy Optimization for LLM Post-Training
- 2025COPO: Causal-Oriented Policy Optimization for Hallucinations of MLLMs
- 2026Towards Generalizable Reasoning: Group Causal Counterfactual Policy Optimization for LLM Reasoning
- 2026Reinforcement Inference: Leveraging Uncertainty for Self-Correcting Language Model Reasoning
- 2026Causal Reward World Models: Zero-shot Reward Design for Automated Skill Generation
- 2026P^2O: Joint Policy and Prompt Optimization