IA2: Alignment with ICL Activations Improves Supervised Fine-Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) is used to specialize model behavior by training weights to produce intended target responses for queries. In contrast, In-Context Learning (ICL) adapts models during inference with instructions or demonstrations in the prompt. ICL can offer better generalizability and more calibrated responses compared to SFT in data scarce settings, at the cost of more inference compute. In this work, we ask the question: Can ICL's internal computations be used to improve the qualities of SFT? We first show that ICL and SFT produce distinct activation patterns, indicating that the two methods achieve adaptation through different functional mechanisms. Motivated by this observation and to use ICL's rich functionality, we introduce ICL Activation Alignment (IA2), a self-distillation technique which aims to replicate ICL's activation patterns in SFT models and incentivizes ICL-like internal reasoning. Performing IA2 as a priming step before SFT significantly improves the accuracy and calibration of model outputs, as shown by our extensive empirical results on 12 popular benchmarks and two model families. This finding is not only practically useful, but also offers a conceptual window into the inner mechanics of model adaptation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 56 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2025.
Builds on
56 of 61 references.
References · 56
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
- 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
38 more
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,122
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 960
- 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 886
- 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 742
- 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 736
- 2022Transformers learn in-context by gradient descentcited by 714
- 2022What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear modelscited by 671
- 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 667
- 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 655
- 2024GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 533
- 2013Good Debt or Bad Debt: Detecting Semantic Orientations in Economic Textscited by 310
- 2023Function Vectors in Large Language Modelscited by 292
- 2019QASC: A Dataset for Question Answering via Sentence Compositioncited by 248
- 2024From Explicit CoT to Implicit CoT: Learning to Internalize CoT Step by Stepcited by 225
- 2025CODI: Compressing Chain-of-Thought into Continuous Space via Self-Distillationcited by 216
- 2021How Many Data Points is a Prompt Worth?cited by 197
- 2024Compressed Chain of Thought: Efficient Reasoning Through Dense Representationscited by 192
- 2025RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets Lesscited by 162
- 2024Distilling System 2 into System 1cited by 152
- 2024Improving Instruction-Following in Language Models through Activation Steeringcited by 149
- 2023Few-shot Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning: A Fair Comparison and Evaluationcited by 134
- 2022Learning by Distilling Contextcited by 128
- 2024Self-Distillation Bridges Distribution Gap in Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 90
- 2019Knowledge Distillation from Internal Representationscited by 87
- 2025Text-to-LoRA: Instant Transformer Adaptioncited by 50
- 2020Investigating Societal Biases in a Poetry Composition Systemcited by 47
- 2024Steering Large Language Models using Conceptors: Improving Addition-Based Activation Engineeringcited by 33
- 2025Steering off Course: Reliability Challenges in Steering Language Modelscited by 29
- 2024Generative Adapter: Contextualizing Language Models in Parameters with A Single Forward Passcited by 26
- 2025Restoring Calibration for Aligned Large Language Models: A Calibration-Aware Fine-Tuning Approachcited by 25
- 2025Training Plug-n-Play Knowledge Modules with Deep Context Distillationcited by 22
- 2023A Study on the Calibration of In-context Learningcited by 21
- 2023Do pretrained Transformers Learn In-Context by Gradient Descent?cited by 18
- 2023Large Language Models are Miscalibrated In-Context Learnerscited by 12
- 2023Investigating the Learning Behaviour of In-context Learning: A Comparison with Supervised Learningcited by 11
- 2024RE-Adapt: Reverse Engineered Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 9
- 2024Exact Conversion of In-Context Learning to Model Weights in Linearized-Attention Transformerscited by 6
- 2024Generative Prompt Internalizationcited by 6
50 most cited of 56 All 56 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Genomic Next-Token Predictors are In-Context Learnerscited by 1
- 2025Genomic Next-Token Predictors are In-Context Learners16 Nov 2025