Representing LLMs in Prompt Semantic Task Space
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) achieve impressive results over various tasks, and ever-expanding public repositories contain an abundance of pre-trained models. Therefore, identifying the best-performing LLM for a given task is a significant challenge. Previous works have suggested learning LLM representations to address this. However, these approaches present limited scalability and require costly retraining to encompass additional models and datasets. Moreover, the produced representation utilizes distinct spaces that cannot be easily interpreted. This work presents an efficient, training-free approach to representing LLMs as linear operators within the prompts' semantic task space, thus providing a highly interpretable representation of the models' application. Our method utilizes closed-form computation of geometrical properties and ensures exceptional scalability and real-time adaptability to dynamically expanding repositories. We demonstrate our approach on success prediction and model selection tasks, achieving competitive or state-of-the-art results with notable performance in out-of-sample scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2025.
Builds on
32 of 57 references.
References · 32
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
- 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
20 more
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
- 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 981
- 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 662
- 2024A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 658
- 2023LoraHub: Efficient Cross-Task Generalization via Dynamic LoRA Compositioncited by 364
- 2021A Diverse Corpus for Evaluating and Developing English Math Word Problem Solverscited by 318
- 2020MiniLMv2: Multi-Head Self-Attention Relation Distillation for Compressing Pretrained Transformerscited by 245
- 2021LogME: Practical Assessment of Pre-trained Models for Transfer Learningcited by 172
- 2024ProSA: Assessing and Understanding the Prompt Sensitivity of LLMscited by 149
- 2024Adding Error Bars to Evals: A Statistical Approach to Language Model Evaluationscited by 148
- 2022Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performancecited by 145
- 2024When Benchmarks are Targets: Revealing the Sensitivity of Large Language Model Leaderboardscited by 137
- 2022An Information-Theoretic Approach to Transferability in Task Transfer Learningcited by 81
- 2023AutoML-GPT: Automatic Machine Learning with GPTcited by 81
- 2024Scaling Laws for Predicting Downstream Performance in LLMscited by 48
- 2024Large Language Models for Medicine: A Surveycited by 38
- 2023LLM Performance Predictors are good initializers for Architecture Searchcited by 29
- 2019AutoML using Metadata Language Embeddingscited by 11
- 2024Understanding the Human-LLM Dynamic: A Literature Survey of LLM Use in Programming Taskscited by 9
- 2022Evidence > Intuition: Transferability Estimation for Encoder Selectioncited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026LOCUS: Low-Dimensional Model Embeddings for Efficient Model Exploration, Comparison, and Selectioncited by 2
- 2026Linguistic Firewall: Geometry as Defense in Multi-Agent Systems Routingcited by 1
- 2026PROMPT2BOX:Improving LLM Weakness Discovery and Specificity Estimation by Uncovering Entailment Structure among Promptscited by 0
- 2026Linguistic Firewall: Geometry as Defense in Multi-Agent Systems Routing29 Jun 2026
- 2026PROMPT2BOX:Improving LLM Weakness Discovery and Specificity Estimation by Uncovering Entailment Structure among Prompts22 Mar 2026
- 2026LOCUS: Low-Dimensional Model Embeddings for Efficient Model Exploration, Comparison, and Selection28 Jan 2026