mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bridging Kolmogorov Complexity and Deep Learning: Asymptotically Optimal Description Length Objectives for Transformers

arXiv 2509.22445 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Minimum Description Length (MDL) principle offers a formal framework for applying Occam's razor in machine learning. However, its application to neural networks such as Transformers is challenging due to the lack of a principled, universal measure for model complexity. This paper introduces the theoretical notion of asymptotically optimal description length objectives, grounded in the theory of Kolmogorov complexity. We establish that a minimizer of such an objective achieves optimal compression, for any dataset, up to an additive constant, in the limit as model resource bounds increase. We prove that asymptotically optimal objectives exist for Transformers, building on a new demonstration of their computational universality. We further show that such objectives can be tractable and differentiable by constructing and analyzing a variational objective based on an adaptive Gaussian mixture prior. Our empirical analysis shows that this variational objective selects for a low-complexity solution with strong generalization on an algorithmic task, but standard optimizers fail to find such solutions from a random initialization, highlighting key optimization challenges. More broadly, by providing a theoretical framework for identifying description length objectives with strong asymptotic guarantees, we outline a potential path towards training neural networks that achieve greater compression and generalization.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 62 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2025.

Builds on

62 of 95 references.

References · 62

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  5. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  6. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
  7. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
  8. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
  9. 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
  10. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  11. 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,148
  12. 2018Self-Attention with Relative Position Representationscited by 1,120
38 more
  1. 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 796
  2. 2018Universal Transformerscited by 647
  3. 2015Variational Dropout and the Local Reparameterization Trickcited by 490
  4. 2019Are Transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?cited by 406
  5. 2018Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Objective Landscapescited by 370
  6. 2023Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: A Theoretical Perspectivecited by 294
  7. 2019Theoretical Limitations of Self-Attention in Neural Sequence Modelscited by 288
  8. 2023Looped Transformers as Programmable Computerscited by 237
  9. 2020Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Lengthcited by 232
  10. 2023Language Modeling Is Compressioncited by 225
  11. 2022Neural Networks and the Chomsky Hierarchycited by 217
  12. 2022Exploring Length Generalization in Large Language Modelscited by 206
  13. 2023What Algorithms can Transformers Learn? A Study in Length Generalizationcited by 199
  14. 2021Thinking Like Transformerscited by 184
  15. 2020Compositional Generalization and Natural Language Variation: Can a Semantic Parsing Approach Handle Both?cited by 147
  16. 2023Sudden Drops in the Loss: Syntax Acquisition, Phase Transitions, and Simplicity Bias in MLMscited by 124
  17. 2023Randomized Positional Encodings Boost Length Generalization of Transformerscited by 117
  18. 2017Bayesian Compression for Deep Learningcited by 116
  19. 2022Overcoming a Theoretical Limitation of Self-Attentioncited by 113
  20. 2022Teaching Algorithmic Reasoning via In-context Learningcited by 112
  21. 2023Tracr: Compiled Transformers as a Laboratory for Interpretabilitycited by 104
  22. 2017Soft Weight-Sharing for Neural Network Compressioncited by 99
  23. 2024Arithmetic Without Algorithms: Language Models Solve Math With a Bag of Heuristicscited by 97
  24. 2022PAC-Bayes Compression Bounds So Tight That They Can Explain Generalizationcited by 76
  25. 2023Generalization on the Unseen, Logic Reasoning and Degree Curriculumcited by 73
  26. 2018The Description Length of Deep Learning Modelscited by 72
  27. 2022Simplicity Bias in Transformers and their Ability to Learn Sparse Boolean Functionscited by 70
  28. 2025Transformers without Normalizationcited by 70
  29. 2023Tighter Bounds on the Expressivity of Transformer Encoderscited by 66
  30. 2023The No Free Lunch Theorem, Kolmogorov Complexity, and the Role of Inductive Biases in Machine Learningcited by 63
  31. 2023Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds for Large Language Modelscited by 53
  32. 2025A Little Depth Goes a Long Way: The Expressive Power of Log-Depth Transformerscited by 53
  33. 2023Memory Augmented Large Language Models are Computationally Universalcited by 47
  34. 2019The Information Complexity of Learning Tasks, their Structure and their Distancecited by 36
  35. 2024Learning Universal Predictorscited by 31
  36. 2023Deep neural networks have an inbuilt Occam's razorcited by 28
  37. 2024On the Representational Capacity of Neural Language Models with Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 26
  38. 2024The Complexity Dynamics of Grokkingcited by 22

50 most cited of 62 All 62 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

6 papers.