mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Effect of Neural Field Reparameterization for 4DVAR

arXiv 2509.21751 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2025cs.LG physics.comp-ph physics.flu-dyncited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Four-dimensional variational data assimilation (4DVAR) is a cornerstone of numerical weather prediction, yet it remains computationally intensive and sensitive to initialization due to the non-convexity of its objective function. We propose a neural field-based reformulation of 4DVAR in which the spatiotemporal state is represented as a continuous function parameterized by a neural network. We demonstrate that optimizing in parameter space leverages the spectral bias of neural fields, acting as an implicit regularizer that stabilizes state estimation and suppresses spurious high-frequency oscillations without requiring explicit background error covariance information. Furthermore, by parameterizing the full spatiotemporal trajectory, our framework enables parallel-in-time optimization and incorporates physical constraints directly through physics-informed losses. Evaluations on chaotic benchmarks, including 2D Kolmogorov flow and 3D Taylor-Green vortices, show that neural reparameterization produces more accurate initial conditions than classical 4DVAR. When combined with separable neural architectures (SPINNs), the method achieves substantial speedups. Unlike many machine learning approaches, this framework requires no ground-truth training data, offering a robust and scalable alternative for operational data assimilation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2025.

Builds on

23 of 58 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 20233D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Renderingcited by 6,226
  3. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  4. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,238
  5. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
  6. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
  7. 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 471
  8. 2017"Zero-Shot" Super-Resolution using Deep Internal Learningcited by 286
  9. 2021Physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints for inverse designcited by 280
  10. 2021Efficient and Modular Implicit Differentiationcited by 203
  11. 2023Score-based Data Assimilationcited by 96
  12. 2022Neural Conservation Laws: A Divergence-Free Perspectivecited by 70
11 more
  1. 2023Separable Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 66
  2. 2024DiffDA: a Diffusion Model for Weather-scale Data Assimilationcited by 61
  3. 2019Neural reparameterization improves structural optimizationcited by 44
  4. 2021Variational Data Assimilation with a Learned Inverse Observation Operatorcited by 28
  5. 2024PIG: Physics-Informed Gaussians as Adaptive Parametric Mesh Representationscited by 11
  6. 2024Controlling diverse robots by inferring Jacobian fields with deep networkscited by 10
  7. 2023Latent assimilation with implicit neural representations for unknown dynamicscited by 9
  8. 2024Accurate deep learning-based filtering for chaotic dynamics by identifying instabilities without an ensemblecited by 7
  9. 2025Tensor-Var: Efficient Four-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilationcited by 4
  10. 2016High performance Python for direct numerical simulations of turbulent flowscited by 3
  11. 2025Neural Operator-Based Nonlinear Nudging for Chaotic Dynamical Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.