mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A State-of-the-Art SQL Reasoning Model using RLVR

arXiv 2509.21459 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.DBcited by 5

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Developing custom reasoning models via Reinforcement Learning (RL) that can incorporate organization-specific knowledge has great potential to address problems faced by enterprise customers. In many of these problems, the reward function is verifiable, a setting termed RL with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR). We apply RLVR to a popular data science benchmark called BIRD that measures the ability of an AI agent to convert a natural language query for a database to SQL executions. We apply a simple and general-purpose training recipe involving careful prompt and model selection, a warm-up stage using our offline RL approach called TAO, followed by rigorous online RLVR training. With no additional training data beyond the BIRD training set and no use of proprietary models, our very first submission to the BIRD leaderboard reached state-of-the-art accuracy on the private test set: 73.56% without self-consistency and 75.68% with self-consistency. In the latter case, our model also required fewer generations than the second-best approach. While BIRD is only a proxy task, the simplicity of our framework makes it broadly applicable to enterprise domains such as business intelligence, data science, and coding.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 14 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.

Builds on

14 of 48 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learning25 Jul
  2. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs17 Jun
  3. 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Model31 Mar

Other references · 11

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  4. 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 832
  5. 2024Data Interpreter: An LLM Agent For Data Sciencecited by 225
  6. 2023Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheatercited by 194
  7. 2025OmniSQL: Synthesizing High-quality Text-to-SQL Data at Scalecited by 91
  8. 2019A Comprehensive Exploration on WikiSQL with Table-Aware Word Contextualizationcited by 88
  9. 2024The Dawn of Natural Language to SQL: Are We Fully Ready?cited by 79
  10. 2025Command A: An Enterprise-Ready Large Language Modelcited by 59
  11. 2025XiYan-SQL: A Novel Multi-Generator Framework For Text-to-SQLcited by 40

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Reasoning-SQL: Reinforcement Learning with SQL Tailored Partial Rewards for Reasoning-Enhanced Text-to-SQL
  2. 2026SUPERNOVA: Eliciting General Reasoning in LLMs with Reinforcement Learning on Natural Instructions
  3. 2025Arctic-Text2SQL-R1: Simple Rewards, Strong Reasoning in Text-to-SQL
  4. 2026Human-Level Text-to-SQL via Reinforcement Learning on Verified Data, Without Pipeline Engineering
  5. 2025Outcome-based Reinforcement Learning to Predict the Future
  6. 2025CogniSQL-R1-Zero: Lightweight Reinforced Reasoning for Efficient SQL Generation
  7. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?
  8. 2026Smart Picks in the Dark: Towards Efficient RLVR for Reasoning via Tracing Metacognitive Pivots