mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Comparative Benchmark of Real-time Detectors for Blueberry Detection towards Precision Orchard Management

arXiv 2509.20580 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2025cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Blueberry detection in natural environments remains challenging due to variable lighting, occlusions, and motion blur due to environmental factors and imaging devices. Deep learning-based object detectors promise to address these challenges, but they demand a large-scale, diverse dataset that captures the real-world complexities. Moreover, deploying these models in practical scenarios often requires the right accuracy/speed/memory trade-off in model selection. This study presents a novel comparative benchmark analysis of advanced real-time object detectors, including YOLO (You Only Look Once) (v8-v12) and RT-DETR (Real-Time Detection Transformers) (v1-v2) families, consisting of 36 model variants, evaluated on a newly curated dataset for blueberry detection. This dataset comprises 661 canopy images collected with smartphones during the 2022-2023 seasons, consisting of 85,879 labelled instances (including 36,256 ripe and 49,623 unripe blueberries) across a wide range of lighting conditions, occlusions, and fruit maturity stages. Among the YOLO models, YOLOv12m achieved the best accuracy with a mAP@50 of 93.3%, while RT-DETRv2-X obtained a mAP@50 of 93.6%, the highest among all the RT-DETR variants. The inference time varied with the model scale and complexity, and the mid-sized models appeared to offer a good accuracy-speed balance. To further enhance detection performance, all the models were fine-tuned using Unbiased Mean Teacher-based semi-supervised learning (SSL) on a separate set of 1,035 unlabeled images acquired by a ground-based machine vision platform in 2024. This resulted in accuracy gains ranging from -1.4% to 2.9%, with RT-DETR-v2-X achieving the best mAP@50 of 94.8%. More in-depth research into SSL is needed to better leverage cross-domain unlabeled data. Both the dataset and software programs of this study are made publicly available to support further research.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2025.

Builds on

17 of 48 references.

References · 17

  1. 2023DETRs Beat YOLOs on Real-time Object Detectioncited by 533
  2. 2024YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 515
  3. 2024YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Informationcited by 425
  4. 2021Unbiased Teacher for Semi-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 306
  5. 2025YOLOv12: Attention-Centric Real-Time Object Detectorscited by 305
  6. 2021A Survey on Deep Semi-supervised Learningcited by 251
  7. 2020Unbiased Mean Teacher for Cross-domain Object Detectioncited by 159
  8. 2024RT-DETRv2: Improved Baseline with Bag-of-Freebies for Real-Time Detection Transformercited by 91
  9. 2025YOLOv13: Real-Time Object Detection with Hypergraph-Enhanced Adaptive Visual Perceptioncited by 58
  10. 2016Deep Fruit Detection in Orchardscited by 38
  11. 2023Semi-DETR: Semi-Supervised Object Detection with Detection Transformerscited by 27
  12. 2025RF-DETR Object Detection vs YOLOv12 : A Study of Transformer-based and CNN-based Architectures for Single-Class and Multi-Class Greenfruit Detection in Complex Orchard Environments Under Label Ambiguitycited by 12
5 more
  1. 2022Weakly and Semi-Supervised Detection, Segmentation and Tracking of Table Grapes with Limited and Noisy Datacited by 7
  2. 2025Vision Transformers in Precision Agriculture: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 6
  3. 2024Semi-Supervised Object Detection: A Survey on Progress from CNN to Transformercited by 4
  4. 2025Semi-Supervised Weed Detection in Vegetable Fields: In-domain and Cross-domain Experimentscited by 4
  5. 2023S3AD: Semi-supervised Small Apple Detection in Orchard Environmentscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.