mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Interpreting ResNet-based CLIP via Neuron-Attention Decomposition

arXiv 2509.19943 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a novel technique for interpreting the neurons in CLIP-ResNet by decomposing their contributions to the output into individual computation paths. More specifically, we analyze all pairwise combinations of neurons and the following attention heads of CLIP's attention-pooling layer. We find that these neuron-head pairs can be approximated by a single direction in CLIP-ResNet's image-text embedding space. Leveraging this insight, we interpret each neuron-head pair by associating it with text. Additionally, we find that only a sparse set of the neuron-head pairs have a significant contribution to the output value, and that some neuron-head pairs, while polysemantic, represent sub-concepts of their corresponding neurons. We use these observations for two applications. First, we employ the pairs for training-free semantic segmentation, outperforming previous methods for CLIP-ResNet. Second, we utilize the contributions of neuron-head pairs to monitor dataset distribution shifts. Our results demonstrate that examining individual computation paths in neural networks uncovers interpretable units, and that such units can be utilized for downstream tasks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2025.

Builds on

28 of 38 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  4. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  5. 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,288
  6. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  7. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
  8. 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,186
  9. 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 871
  10. 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
  11. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
  12. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
16 more
  1. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 610
  2. 2021Extract Free Dense Labels from CLIPcited by 583
  3. 2023Interpreting CLIP's Image Representation via Text-Based Decompositioncited by 196
  4. 2022PointCLIP V2: Prompting CLIP and GPT for Powerful 3D Open-world Learningcited by 187
  5. 2023SCLIP: Rethinking Self-Attention for Dense Vision-Language Inferencecited by 170
  6. 2022Natural Language Descriptions of Deep Visual Featurescited by 137
  7. 2024Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)cited by 119
  8. 2023Grounding Everything: Emerging Localization Properties in Vision-Language Transformerscited by 91
  9. 2024Explore the Potential of CLIP for Training-Free Open Vocabulary Semantic Segmentationcited by 61
  10. 2025ConceptAttention: Diffusion Transformers Learn Highly Interpretable Featurescited by 52
  11. 2025Vision Transformers Don't Need Trained Registerscited by 41
  12. 2024Interpreting the Second-Order Effects of Neurons in CLIPcited by 36
  13. 2024Self-Calibrated CLIP for Training-Free Open-Vocabulary Segmentationcited by 34
  14. 2023What Causes Polysemanticity? An Alternative Origin Story of Mixed Selectivity from Incidental Causescited by 19
  15. 2024Linear Explanations for Individual Neuronscited by 19
  16. 2025Quantifying Structure in CLIP Embeddings: A Statistical Framework for Concept Interpretationcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.