mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep Learning for Clouds and Cloud Shadow Segmentation in Methane Satellite and Airborne Imaging Spectroscopy

arXiv 2509.19665 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Effective cloud and cloud shadow detection is a critical prerequisite for accurate retrieval of concentrations of atmospheric methane (CH4) or other trace gases in hyperspectral remote sensing. This challenge is especially pertinent for MethaneSAT, a satellite mission launched in March 2024, to fill a significant data gap in terms of resolution, precision and swath between coarse-resolution global mappers and fine-scale point-source imagers of methane, and for its airborne companion mission, MethaneAIR. MethaneSAT delivers hyperspectral data at an intermediate spatial resolution (approx. 100 x 400, m), whereas MethaneAIR provides even finer resolution (approx. 25 m), enabling the development of highly detailed maps of concentrations that enable quantification of both the sources and rates of emissions. In this study, we use machine learning methods to address the cloud and cloud shadow detection problem for sensors with these high spatial resolutions. Cloud and cloud shadows in remote sensing data need to be effectively screened out as they bias methane retrievals in remote sensing imagery and impact the quantification of emissions. We deploy and evaluate conventional techniques-including Iterative Logistic Regression (ILR) and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP)-with advanced deep learning architectures, namely U-Net and a Spectral Channel Attention Network (SCAN) method. Our results show that conventional methods struggle with spatial coherence and boundary definition, affecting the detection of clouds and cloud shadows. Deep learning models substantially improve detection quality: U-Net performs best in preserving spatial structure, while SCAN excels at capturing fine boundary details... Our data and code is publicly available at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/IKLZOJ

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2025.

Builds on

16 of 81 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  3. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
  4. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  5. 2018CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Modulecited by 2,477
  6. 2019ECA-Net: Efficient Channel Attention for Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
  7. 2021SpectralFormer: Rethinking Hyperspectral Image Classification with Transformerscited by 169
  8. 2021Hyperspectral Image Classification-Traditional to Deep Models: A Survey for Future Prospectscited by 49
  9. 2024A Comprehensive Survey for Hyperspectral Image Classification: The Evolution from Conventional to Transformers and Mamba Modelscited by 19
  10. 2020Fast and Accurate Retrieval of Methane Concentration from Imaging Spectrometer Data Using Sparsity Priorcited by 12
  11. 2023MethaneMapper: Spectral Absorption aware Hyperspectral Transformer for Methane Detectioncited by 12
  12. 2025Towards Operational Automated Greenhouse Gas Plume Detection and Delineationcited by 6
4 more
  1. 2023CD-CTFM: A Lightweight CNN-Transformer Network for Remote Sensing Cloud Detection Fusing Multiscale Featurescited by 4
  2. 2023Hyperspectral shadow removal with Iterative Logistic Regression and latent Parametric Linear Combination of Gaussianscited by 2
  3. 2025Multi-Platform Methane Plume Detection via Model and Domain Adaptationcited by 2
  4. 2020Cloud detection machine learning algorithms for PROBA-Vcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.