mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Analyzing Uncertainty Quantification in Statistical and Deep Learning Models for Probabilistic Electricity Price Forecasting

arXiv 2509.19417 ↗First posted 23 Sep 2025cs.LG math.ST stat.THcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Precise probabilistic forecasts are fundamental for energy risk management, and there is a wide range of both statistical and machine learning models for this purpose. Inherent to these probabilistic models is some form of uncertainty quantification. However, most models do not capture the full extent of uncertainty, which arises not only from the data itself but also from model and distributional choices. In this study, we examine uncertainty quantification in state-of-the-art statistical and deep learning probabilistic forecasting models for electricity price forecasting in the German market. In particular, we consider deep distributional neural networks (DDNNs) and augment them with an ensemble approach, Monte Carlo (MC) dropout, and conformal prediction to account for model uncertainty. Additionally, we consider the LASSO-estimated autoregressive (LEAR) approach combined with quantile regression averaging (QRA), generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH), and conformal prediction. Across a range of performance metrics, we find that the LEAR-based models perform well in terms of probabilistic forecasting, irrespective of the uncertainty quantification method. Furthermore, we find that DDNNs benefit from incorporating both data and model uncertainty, improving both point and probabilistic forecasting. Uncertainty itself appears to be best captured by the models using conformal prediction. Overall, our extensive study shows that all models under consideration perform competitively. However, their relative performance depends on the choice of metrics for point and probabilistic forecasting.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2025.

Builds on

15 of 42 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  3. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  4. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  5. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  6. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 819
  7. 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 680
  8. 2019Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 355
  9. 2020Forecasting day-ahead electricity prices: A review of state-of-the-art algorithms, best practices and an open-access benchmarkcited by 108
  10. 2019Distribution Calibration for Regressioncited by 89
  11. 2023A Survey on Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Deep Learningcited by 81
  12. 2022Distributional neural networks for electricity price forecastingcited by 24
3 more
  1. 2024Uncertainty Regularized Evidential Regressioncited by 13
  2. 2024Postprocessing of point predictions for probabilistic forecasting of day-ahead electricity prices: The benefits of using isotonic distributional regressioncited by 7
  3. 2022Electricity Price Forecasting Model based on Gated Recurrent Unitscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.