Linear Regression under Missing or Corrupted Coordinates
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study multivariate linear regression under Gaussian covariates in two settings, where data may be erased or corrupted by an adversary under a coordinate-wise budget. In the incomplete data setting, an adversary may inspect the dataset and delete entries in up to an η-fraction of samples per coordinate; a strong form of the Missing Not At Random model. In the corrupted data setting, the adversary instead replaces values arbitrarily, and the corruption locations are unknown to the learner. Despite substantial work on missing data, linear regression under such adversarial missingness remains poorly understood, even information-theoretically. Unlike the clean setting, where estimation error vanishes with more samples, here the optimal error remains a positive function of the problem parameters. Our main contribution is to characterize this error up to constant factors across essentially the entire parameter range. Specifically, we establish novel information-theoretic lower bounds on the achievable error that match the error of (computationally efficient) algorithms. A key implication is that, perhaps surprisingly, the optimal error in the missing data setting matches that in the corruption setting-so knowing the corruption locations offers no general advantage.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2025.
Builds on
31 of 68 references.
References · 31
- 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 802
- 2018Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attackscited by 484
- 2017Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attackscited by 303
- 2016Robust Estimators in High Dimensions without the Computational Intractabilitycited by 209
- 2016Agnostic Estimation of Mean and Covariancecited by 131
- 2021SPECTRE: Defending Against Backdoor Attacks Using Robust Statisticscited by 130
- 2018Efficient Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Robust Linear Regressioncited by 76
- 2018Efficient Algorithms for Outlier-Robust Regressioncited by 72
- 2021What's a good imputation to predict with missing values?cited by 62
- 2018Graphical Models for Processing Missing Datacited by 58
- 2019On the consistency of supervised learning with missing valuescited by 53
- 2020Robust regression with covariate filtering: Heavy tails and adversarial contaminationcited by 50
19 more
- 2017Robustly Learning a Gaussian: Getting Optimal Error, Efficientlycited by 39
- 2020Optimal Robust Linear Regression in Nearly Linear Timecited by 32
- 2018Efficient Statistics, in High Dimensions, from Truncated Samplescited by 28
- 2020Computationally and Statistically Efficient Truncated Regressioncited by 24
- 2019Efficient Truncated Statistics with Unknown Truncationcited by 22
- 2020Linear predictor on linearly-generated data with missing values: non consistency and solutionscited by 20
- 2020Truncated Linear Regression in High Dimensionscited by 13
- 2023Robustly Learning a Single Neuron via Sharpnesscited by 12
- 2013Tuned Models of Peer Assessment in MOOCscited by 10
- 2020Imputation for High-Dimensional Linear Regressioncited by 10
- 2022Efficient Truncated Linear Regression with Unknown Noise Variancecited by 10
- 2023Near-Optimal Algorithms for Gaussians with Huber Contamination: Mean Estimation and Linear Regressioncited by 7
- 2020Robust Mean Estimation on Highly Incomplete Data with Arbitrary Outlierscited by 6
- 2020On Robust Mean Estimation under Coordinate-level Corruptioncited by 4
- 2023Nonparametric classification with missing datacited by 4
- 2023Collaboratively Learning Linear Models with Structured Missing Datacited by 3
- 2024Learning a Single Neuron Robustly to Distributional Shifts and Adversarial Label Noisecited by 2
- 2025Learning High-dimensional Gaussians from Censored Datacited by 2
- 2022Minimax rate of consistency for linear models with missing valuescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.