mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Instruction-Following Evaluation in Function Calling for Large Language Models

arXiv 2509.18420 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2025cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Tool learning and function calling

Abstract (arXiv)

Function calling is a core capability of large language models, essential for AI agents. Existing benchmarks such as the Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL), tau^2-Bench (arXiv:2506.07982), and ACEBench (arXiv:2501.12851) evaluate argument correctness but do not test adherence to format instructions embedded in parameter descriptions, such as enclosing values in double quotes or using ISO date formats. We introduce IFEval-FC, a benchmark inspired by IFEval (arXiv:2311.07911) that assesses precise instruction following in function calling. IFEval-FC encodes verifiable formats directly within JSON schema descriptions, for example specifying that a value must not contain punctuation. It includes 750 test cases, each consisting of a function with an embedded format for one of its input parameters and a corresponding user query. Evaluation is fully algorithmic, ensuring objectivity, reproducibility, and scalability. Our results show that even state-of-the-art proprietary models, including GPT-5 and Claude 4.1 Opus, frequently fail to follow basic formatting rules, highlighting a practical limitation for real-world agent systems. The complete codebase and data are publicly available at https://github.com/Skripkon/IFEval-FC.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Tool learning and function calling, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 5 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2025.

Builds on

5 of 7 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025ACEBench: Who Wins the Match Point in Tool Usage?22 Jan

Other references · 4

  1. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
  2. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
  3. 2025τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environmentcited by 627
  4. 2025M-IFEval: Multilingual Instruction-Following Evaluationcited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Small Reasoning Models are Instruction Followers in Function Calling
  2. 2025On the Robustness of Agentic Function Calling
  3. 2026The "I Don't Know" Filter: Enhancing Agentic Reliability in Function Calling
  4. 2026IndicIFEval: A Benchmark for Verifiable Instruction-Following Evaluation in 14 Indic Languages
  5. 2025Improving Large Language Models Function Calling and Interpretability via Guided-Structured Templates
  6. 2023FollowEval: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Assessing the Instruction-Following Capability of Large Language Models
  7. 2025ComplexFuncBench: Exploring Multi-Step and Constrained Function Calling under Long-Context Scenario
  8. 2024Enhancing Function-Calling Capabilities in LLMs: Strategies for Prompt Formats, Data Integration, and Multilingual Translation