Training-free Truthfulness Detection via Sparse MLP Value Vectors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) are prone to generating factually incorrect content, motivating methods for assessing truthfulness from internal model signals. While supervised probing approaches can be effective, they require labeled data and classifier training. Recent training-free methods avoid parameter optimization but rely on coarse activation statistics that provide limited insight into how truthfulness-related signals arise within the model. We present a training-free approach that operates at the level of individual multi-layer perceptron (MLP) value vectors. Through a systematic analysis, we find that although most value vectors show no meaningful signal, a sparse subset exhibits stable and directionally consistent correlations with content truthfulness. Leveraging this observation, we propose TruthV, a simple inference method that aggregates preferences expressed by these value vectors. TruthV requires only a small support set to identify relevant vectors and introduces no additional model parameters or classifier weights. We evaluate TruthV across model scales from 2B to 13B and multiple benchmarks, including question answering, natural language understanding, and hallucination evaluation. TruthV consistently outperforms existing training-free baselines, demonstrating that truthfulness-related variation in LLMs is captured in a sparse and structured manner at the level of MLP value vectors.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2025.
Builds on
26 of 32 references.
References · 26
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
- 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,804
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
- 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 767
- 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 659
- 2021Knowledge Neurons in Pretrained Transformerscited by 601
14 more
- 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 532
- 2023HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 341
- 2018SWAG: A Large-Scale Adversarial Dataset for Grounded Commonsense Inferencecited by 333
- 2019QASC: A Dataset for Question Answering via Sentence Compositioncited by 252
- 2021Adversarial GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark for Robustness Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 232
- 2024Lookback Lens: Detecting and Mitigating Contextual Hallucinations in Large Language Models Using Only Attention Mapscited by 142
- 2024HaloScope: Harnessing Unlabeled LLM Generations for Hallucination Detectioncited by 99
- 2023Attention Satisfies: A Constraint-Satisfaction Lens on Factual Errors of Language Modelscited by 67
- 2023Do Androids Know They're Only Dreaming of Electric Sheep?cited by 67
- 2025Steer LLM Latents for Hallucination Detectioncited by 50
- 2022CICERO: A Dataset for Contextualized Commonsense Inference in Dialoguescited by 38
- 2024On the Universal Truthfulness Hyperplane Inside LLMscited by 24
- 2022Multiview Contextual Commonsense Inference: A New Dataset and Taskcited by 11
- 2024Enhanced Hallucination Detection in Neural Machine Translation through Simple Detector Aggregationcited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.