MEF: A Systematic Evaluation Framework for Text-to-Image Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Rapid advances in text-to-image (T2I) generation have raised higher requirements for evaluation methodologies. Existing benchmarks center on objective capabilities and dimensions, but lack an application-scenario perspective, limiting external validity. Moreover, current evaluations typically rely on either ELO for overall ranking or MOS for dimension-specific scoring, yet both methods have inherent shortcomings and limited interpretability. Therefore, we introduce the Magic Evaluation Framework (MEF), a systematic and practical approach for evaluating T2I models. First, we propose a structured taxonomy encompassing user scenarios, elements, element compositions, and text expression forms to construct the Magic-Bench-377, which supports label-level assessment and ensures a balanced coverage of both user scenarios and capabilities. On this basis, we combine ELO and dimension-specific MOS to generate model rankings and fine-grained assessments respectively. This joint evaluation method further enables us to quantitatively analyze the contribution of each dimension to user satisfaction using multivariate logistic regression. By applying MEF to current T2I models, we obtain a leaderboard and key characteristics of the leading models. We release our evaluation framework and make Magic-Bench-377 fully open-source to advance research in the evaluation of visual generative models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2025.
Builds on
24 of 35 references.
References · 24
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
- 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,322
- 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
- 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,094
- 2025Wan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Modelscited by 2,536
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
- 2022Scaling Autoregressive Models for Content-Rich Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,287
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,151
- 2023GenEval: An Object-Focused Framework for Evaluating Text-to-Image Alignmentcited by 946
- 2023TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answeringcited by 416
12 more
- 2023T2I-CompBench++: An Enhanced and Comprehensive Benchmark for Compositional Text-to-image Generationcited by 253
- 2025WISE: A World Knowledge-Informed Semantic Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 196
- 2025Seedream 3.0 Technical Reportcited by 146
- 2024LLaVA-Critic: Learning to Evaluate Multimodal Modelscited by 132
- 2024GenAI-Bench: Evaluating and Improving Compositional Text-to-Visual Generationcited by 130
- 2024An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge for LLM Evaluation: Fine-tuned Judge Model is not a General Substitute for GPT-4cited by 90
- 2024A Systematic Survey and Critical Review on Evaluating Large Language Models: Challenges, Limitations, and Recommendationscited by 84
- 2024ConceptMix: A Compositional Image Generation Benchmark with Controllable Difficultycited by 60
- 2025GPT-ImgEval: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Diagnosing GPT4o in Image Generationcited by 57
- 2024VHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Modelscited by 53
- 2023DEsignBench: Exploring and Benchmarking DALL-E 3 for Imagining Visual Designcited by 17
- 2024GradBias: Unveiling Word Influence on Bias in Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.