How Persuasive is Your Context?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Two central capabilities of language models (LMs) are: (i) drawing on prior knowledge about entities, which allows them to answer queries such as "What's the official language of Austria?", and (ii) adapting to new information provided in context, e.g., "Pretend the official language of Austria is Tagalog.", that is pre-pended to the question. In this article, we introduce targeted persuasion score (TPS), designed to quantify how persuasive a given context is to an LM where persuasion is operationalized as the ability of the context to alter the LM's answer to the question. In contrast to evaluating persuasiveness only by inspecting the greedily decoded answer under the model, TPS provides a more fine-grained view of model behavior. Based on the Wasserstein distance, TPS measures how much a context shifts a model's original answer distribution toward a target distribution. Empirically, through a series of experiments, we show that TPS captures a more nuanced notion of persuasiveness than previously proposed metrics.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2025.
Builds on
28 of 56 references.
References · 28
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,936
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
- 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,122
- 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 817
- 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 719
- 2023Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methodscited by 359
16 more
- 2021Entity-Based Knowledge Conflicts in Question Answeringcited by 356
- 2023Adaptive Chameleon or Stubborn Sloth: Revealing the Behavior of Large Language Models in Knowledge Conflictscited by 341
- 2024Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Surveycited by 205
- 2022Large Language Models with Controllable Working Memorycited by 169
- 2022Rich Knowledge Sources Bring Complex Knowledge Conflicts: Recalibrating Models to Reflect Conflicting Evidencecited by 144
- 2023Automated Annotation with Generative AI Requires Validationcited by 76
- 2023Can LMs Learn New Entities from Descriptions? Challenges in Propagating Injected Knowledgecited by 67
- 2025Large Language Model Hacking: Quantifying the Hidden Risks of Using LLMs for Text Annotationcited by 50
- 2023Do Models Really Learn to Follow Instructions? An Empirical Study of Instruction Tuningcited by 49
- 2024Codebook LLMs: Evaluating LLMs as Measurement Tools for Political Science Conceptscited by 30
- 2024Controllable Context Sensitivity and the Knob Behind Itcited by 23
- 2024Prompt Stability Scoring for Text Annotation with Large Language Modelscited by 15
- 2023Towards Coding Social Science Datasets with Language Modelscited by 11
- 2023Are Chatbots Reliable Text Annotators? Sometimescited by 9
- 2025Measuring Scalar Constructs in Social Science with LLMscited by 9
- 2025Language Models over Canonical Byte-Pair Encodingscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.