An Empirical Study on the Robustness of YOLO Models for Underwater Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Underwater object detection (UOD) remains a critical challenge in computer vision due to underwater distortions which degrade low-level features and compromise the reliability of even state-of-the-art detectors. While YOLO models have become the backbone of real-time object detection, little work has systematically examined their robustness under these uniquely challenging conditions. This raises a critical question: Are YOLO models genuinely robust when operating under the chaotic and unpredictable conditions of underwater environments? In this study, we present one of the first comprehensive evaluations of recent YOLO variants (YOLOv8-YOLOv12) across six simulated underwater environments. Using a unified dataset of 10,000 annotated images from DUO and Roboflow100, we not only benchmark model robustness but also analyze how distortions affect key low-level features such as texture, edges, and color. Our findings show that (1) YOLOv12 delivers the strongest overall performance but is highly vulnerable to noise, and (2) noise disrupts edge and texture features, explaining the poor detection performance in noisy images. Class imbalance is a persistent challenge in UOD. Experiments revealed that (3) image counts and instance frequency primarily drive detection performance, while object appearance exerts only a secondary influence. Finally, we evaluated lightweight training-aware strategies: noise-aware sample injection, which improves robustness in both noisy and real-world conditions, and fine-tuning with advanced enhancement, which boosts accuracy in enhanced domains but slightly lowers performance in original data, demonstrating strong potential for domain adaptation, respectively. Together, these insights provide practical guidance for building resilient and cost-efficient UOD systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2025.
Builds on
16 of 41 references.
References · 16
- 2024YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Informationcited by 425
- 2025YOLOv12: Attention-Centric Real-Time Object Detectorscited by 305
- 2024Not All Noises Are Created Equally:Diffusion Noise Selection and Optimizationcited by 71
- 2021A Dataset And Benchmark Of Underwater Object Detection For Robot Pickingcited by 31
- 2025Underwater Image Restoration Through a Prior Guided Hybrid Sense Approach and Extensive Benchmark Analysiscited by 17
- 2025FBRT-YOLO: Faster and Better for Real-Time Aerial Image Detectioncited by 13
- 2019Texture image analysis and texture classification methods - A reviewcited by 10
- 2023MedYOLO: A Medical Image Object Detection Frameworkcited by 5
- 2023A systematic study of the foreground-background imbalance problem in deep learning for object detectioncited by 3
- 2024Beneath the Surface: The Role of Underwater Image Enhancement in Object Detectioncited by 3
- 2024Grey Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) Based Second Order Statistics for Image Texture Analysiscited by 2
- 2023Joint Perceptual Learning for Enhancement and Object Detection in Underwater Scenarioscited by 1
4 more
- 2024Agricultural Object Detection with You Look Only Once (YOLO) Algorithm: A Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 1
- 2024YOLO-Vehicle-Pro: A Cloud-Edge Collaborative Framework for Object Detection in Autonomous Driving under Adverse Weather Conditionscited by 1
- 2025SCC-YOLO: An Improved Object Detector for Assisting in Brain Tumor Diagnosiscited by 1
- 2025Improve Underwater Object Detection through YOLOv12 Architecture and Physics-informed Augmentationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.