mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Explainable AI for Analyzing Person-Specific Patterns in Facial Recognition Tasks

arXiv 2509.17457 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The proliferation of facial recognition systems presents major privacy risks, driving the need for effective countermeasures. Current adversarial techniques apply generalized methods rather than adapting to individual facial characteristics, limiting their effectiveness and inconspicuousness. In this work, we introduce Layer Embedding Activation Mapping (LEAM), a novel technique that identifies which facial areas contribute most to recognition at an individual level. Unlike adversarial attack methods that aim to fool recognition systems, LEAM is an explainability technique designed to understand how these systems work, providing insights that could inform future privacy protection research. We integrate LEAM with a face parser to analyze data from 1000 individuals across 9 pre-trained facial recognition models. Our analysis reveals that while different layers within facial recognition models vary significantly in their focus areas, these models generally prioritize similar facial regions across architectures when considering their overall activation patterns, which show significantly higher similarity between images of the same individual (Bhattacharyya Coefficient: 0.32-0.57) vs. different individuals (0.04-0.13), validating the existence of person-specific recognition patterns. Our results show that facial recognition models prioritize the central region of face images (with nose areas accounting for 18.9-29.7% of critical recognition regions), while still distributing attention across multiple facial fragments. Proper selection of relevant facial areas was confirmed using validation occlusions, based on just 1% of the most relevant, LEAM-identified, image pixels, which proved to be transferable across different models. Our findings establish the foundation for future individually tailored privacy protection systems centered around LEAM's choice of areas to be perturbed.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2025.

Builds on

19 of 48 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  2. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
  3. 2018CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 971
  4. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
  5. 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 914
  6. 2014Learning Face Representation from Scratchcited by 453
  7. 2018Invertible Residual Networkscited by 365
  8. 2019Efficient Decision-based Black-box Adversarial Attacks on Face Recognitioncited by 175
  9. 2020Partial FC: Training 10 Million Identities on a Single Machinecited by 163
  10. 2021LowKey: Leveraging Adversarial Attacks to Protect Social Media Users from Facial Recognitioncited by 94
  11. 2024Is Cosine-Similarity of Embeddings Really About Similarity?cited by 89
  12. 2017A General Framework for Adversarial Examples with Objectivescited by 84
7 more
  1. 2018The Devil of Face Recognition is in the Noisecited by 65
  2. 2023Towards Effective Adversarial Textured 3D Meshes on Physical Face Recognitioncited by 33
  3. 2020Adapting Grad-CAM for Embedding Networkscited by 21
  4. 2021Dodging Attack Using Carefully Crafted Natural Makeupcited by 17
  5. 2022Controllable Evaluation and Generation of Physical Adversarial Patch on Face Recognitioncited by 8
  6. 2024The Hidden Pitfalls of the Cosine Similarity Losscited by 7
  7. 2024Generalizing GradCAM for Embedding Networkscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.