MPCG: Multi-Round Persona-Conditioned Generation for Modeling the Evolution of Misinformation with LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Misinformation evolves as it spreads, shifting in language, framing, and moral emphasis to adapt to new audiences. However, current misinformation detection approaches implicitly assume that misinformation is static. We introduce MPCG, a multi-round, persona-conditioned framework that simulates how claims are iteratively reinterpreted by agents with distinct ideological perspectives. Our approach uses an uncensored large language model (LLM) to generate persona-specific claims across multiple rounds, conditioning each generation on outputs from the previous round, enabling the study of misinformation evolution. We evaluate the generated claims through human and LLM-based annotations, cognitive effort metrics (readability, perplexity), emotion evocation metrics (sentiment analysis, morality), clustering, feasibility, and downstream classification. Results show strong agreement between human and GPT-4o-mini annotations, with higher divergence in fluency judgments. Generated claims require greater cognitive effort than the original claims and consistently reflect persona-aligned emotional and moral framing. Clustering and cosine similarity analyses confirm semantic drift across rounds while preserving topical coherence. Feasibility results show a 77% feasibility rate, confirming suitability for downstream tasks. Classification results reveal that commonly used misinformation detectors experience macro-F1 performance drops of up to 49.7%. The code is available at https://github.com/bcjr1997/MPCG
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2025.
Builds on
27 of 44 references.
References · 27
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,375
- 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,254
- 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 417
- 2017"Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detectioncited by 363
- 2024Humans or LLMs as the Judge? A Study on Judgement Biasescited by 323
- 2023Unleashing the Emergent Cognitive Synergy in Large Language Models: A Task-Solving Agent through Multi-Persona Self-Collaborationcited by 251
- 2023AVeriTeC: A Dataset for Real-world Claim Verification with Evidence from the Webcited by 144
15 more
- 2020Evaluating the Evaluation of Diversity in Natural Language Generationcited by 129
- 2023On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Modelscited by 128
- 2023Fake News in Sheep's Clothing: Robust Fake News Detection Against LLM-Empowered Style Attackscited by 70
- 2022Generating Scientific Claims for Zero-Shot Scientific Fact Checkingcited by 59
- 2024From Skepticism to Acceptance: Simulating the Attitude Dynamics Toward Fake Newscited by 51
- 2024The Oscars of AI Theater: A Survey on Role-Playing with Language Modelscited by 48
- 2021Zero-shot Fact Verification by Claim Generationcited by 42
- 2024DELL: Generating Reactions and Explanations for LLM-Based Misinformation Detectioncited by 41
- 2023Explainable Claim Verification via Knowledge-Grounded Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 37
- 2024Beyond correlation: The Impact of Human Uncertainty in Measuring the Effectiveness of Automatic Evaluation and LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 31
- 2024MoralBERT: A Fine-Tuned Language Model for Capturing Moral Values in Social Discussionscited by 23
- 2024Why Misinformation is Created? Detecting them by Integrating Intent Featurescited by 11
- 2024A Guide to Misinformation Detection Data and Evaluationcited by 10
- 2025The Missing Parts: Augmenting Fact Verification with Half-Truth Detectioncited by 7
- 2024Fact or Fiction? Can LLMs be Reliable Annotators for Political Truths?cited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026The Facade of Truth: Uncovering and Mitigating LLM Susceptibility to Deceptive Evidencecited by 3
- 2026You Can't Fool Us: Understanding the Resilience of LLM-driven Agent Communities to Misinformationcited by 1
- 2026Large Language Models in Misinformation Ecosystems: Misuse, Defense, and Vulnerabilitycited by 0
- 2026TA-RAG: Tone Awareness as a Design Imperative for Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 0
- 2026TA-RAG: Tone Awareness as a Design Imperative for Retrieval-Augmented Generation7 Aug 2026
- 2026Large Language Models in Misinformation Ecosystems: Misuse, Defense, and Vulnerability11 Jul 2026
- 2026You Can't Fool Us: Understanding the Resilience of LLM-driven Agent Communities to Misinformation17 May 2026
- 2026The Facade of Truth: Uncovering and Mitigating LLM Susceptibility to Deceptive Evidence9 Jan 2026