FairTune: A Bias-Aware Fine-Tuning Framework Towards Fair Heart Rate Prediction from PPG
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Foundation models pretrained on physiological data such as photoplethysmography (PPG) signals are increasingly used to improve heart rate (HR) prediction across diverse settings. Fine-tuning these models for local deployment is often seen as a practical and scalable strategy. However, its impact on demographic fairness particularly under domain shifts remains underexplored. We fine-tune PPG-GPT a transformer-based foundation model pretrained on intensive care unit (ICU) data across three heterogeneous datasets (ICU, wearable, smartphone) and systematically evaluate the effects on HR prediction accuracy and gender fairness. While fine-tuning substantially reduces mean absolute error (up to 80%), it can simultaneously widen fairness gaps, especially in larger models and under significant distributional characteristics shifts. To address this, we introduce FairTune, a bias-aware fine-tuning framework in which we benchmark three mitigation strategies: class weighting based on inverse group frequency (IF), Group Distributionally Robust Optimization (GroupDRO), and adversarial debiasing (ADV). We find that IF and GroupDRO significantly reduce fairness gaps without compromising accuracy, with effectiveness varying by deployment domain. Representation analyses further reveal that mitigation techniques reshape internal embeddings to reduce demographic clustering. Our findings highlight that fairness does not emerge as a natural byproduct of fine-tuning and that explicit mitigation is essential for equitable deployment of physiological foundation models.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2025.
Builds on
15 of 39 references.
References · 15
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2021Exploring the Limits of Large Scale Pre-trainingcited by 104
- 2023When Foundation Model Meets Federated Learning: Motivations, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 84
- 2024Foundation Model for Advancing Healthcare: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directionscited by 77
- 2023Overwriting Pretrained Bias with Finetuning Datacited by 32
- 2023Multimodal Clinical Benchmark for Emergency Care (MC-BEC): A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models in Emergency Medicinecited by 24
- 2024Erasing the Bias: Fine-Tuning Foundation Models for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 19
- 2024Personalized Adapter for Large Meteorology Model on Devices: Towards Weather Foundation Modelscited by 15
- 2025GPT-PPG: A GPT-based Foundation Model for Photoplethysmography Signalscited by 15
- 2024Fairness and Bias Mitigation in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.
- 2025Generalist vs Specialist Time Series Foundation Models: Investigating Potential Emergent Behaviors in Assessing Human Health Using PPG Signals16 Oct 2025
- 2025Wav2Arrest 2.0: Long-Horizon Cardiac Arrest Prediction with Time-to-Event Modeling, Identity-Invariance, and Pseudo-Lab Alignment25 Sep 2025