Aligning Audio Captions with Human Preferences
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Diffusion and multimodal model alignment
Abstract (arXiv)
Current audio captioning relies on supervised learning with paired audio-caption data, which is costly to curate and may not reflect human preferences in real-world scenarios. To address this, we propose a preference-aligned audio captioning framework based on Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). To capture nuanced preferences, we train a Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining (CLAP) based reward model using human-labeled pairwise preference data. This reward model is integrated into an RL framework to fine-tune any baseline captioning system without ground-truth annotations. Extensive human evaluations across multiple datasets show that our method produces captions preferred over baseline models, particularly when baselines fail to provide correct and natural captions. Furthermore, our framework achieves performance comparable to supervised approaches with ground-truth data, demonstrating effective alignment with human preferences and scalability in real-world use.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and multimodal model alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 17 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2025.
Builds on
17 of 24 references.
References · 17
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,046
- 2022Large-scale Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining with Feature Fusion and Keyword-to-Caption Augmentationcited by 719
- 2019PANNs: Large-Scale Pretrained Audio Neural Networks for Audio Pattern Recognitioncited by 574
- 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 547
- 2019Clotho: An Audio Captioning Datasetcited by 358
- 2024Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Studycited by 262
- 2025Reward Shaping to Mitigate Reward Hacking in RLHFcited by 88
- 2020Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning with REINFORCEcited by 86
- 2021Can Audio Captions Be Evaluated with Image Caption Metrics?cited by 33
- 2023CoNeTTE: An efficient Audio Captioning system leveraging multiple datasets with Task Embeddingcited by 13
- 2023Parameter Efficient Audio Captioning With Faithful Guidance Using Audio-text Shared Latent Representationcited by 5
5 more
- 2024MACE: Leveraging Audio for Evaluating Audio Captioning Systemscited by 5
- 2024Leveraging Audio-Only Data for Text-Queried Target Sound Extractioncited by 4
- 2025Human-CLAP: Human-perception-based contrastive language-audio pretrainingcited by 4
- 2022Improving Audio Captioning Using Semantic Similarity Metricscited by 2
- 2023Detecting False Alarms and Misses in Audio Captionscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024AlignCap: Aligning Speech Emotion Captioning to Human Preferences
- 2025TACOS: Temporally-aligned Audio CaptiOnS for Language-Audio Pretraining
- 2026Direct Preference Density Alignment for Conversational Audio Equalization
- 2024Enhancing Image Caption Generation Using Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback
- 2024SpeechAlign: Aligning Speech Generation to Human Preferences
- 2026Same Words, Different Judgments: How Preferences Vary Across Modalities
- 2026VA-Judger: Reward Modeling from Human Preference Feedback for Joint Video-Audio Generation
- 2025AVC-DPO: Aligned Video Captioning via Direct Preference Optimization