A Neural Network for the Identical Kuramoto Equation: Architectural Considerations and Performance Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we investigate the efficiency of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to approximate the solution of a nonlocal conservation law derived from the identical-oscillator Kuramoto model, focusing on the evaluation of an architectural choice and its impact on solution accuracy based on the energy norm and computation time. Through systematic experimentation, we demonstrate that network configuration parameters-specifically, activation function selection (tanh vs. sin vs. ReLU), network depth (4-8 hidden layers), width (64-256 neurons), and training methodology (collocation points, epoch count)-significantly influence convergence characteristics. We observe that tanh activation yields stable convergence across configurations, whereas sine activation can attain marginally lower errors and training times in isolated cases, but occasionally produce nonphysical artefacts. Our comparative analysis with traditional numerical methods shows that optimally configured DNNs offer competitive accuracy with notably different computational trade-offs. Furthermore, we identify fundamental limitations of standard feed-forward architectures when handling singular or piecewise-constant solutions, providing empirical evidence that such networks inherently oversmooth sharp features due to the natural function space limitations of standard activation functions. This work contributes to the growing body of research on neural network-based scientific computing by providing practitioners with empirical guidelines for DNN implementation while illuminating fundamental theoretical constraints that must be overcome to expand their applicability to more challenging physical systems with discontinuities.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2025.
Builds on
6 of 16 references.
References · 6
- 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
- 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
- 2020On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networkscited by 284
- 2020hp-VPINNs: Variational Physics-Informed Neural Networks With Domain Decompositioncited by 236
- 2023On the Generalization of PINNs outside the training domain and the Hyperparameters influencing itcited by 10
- 2024Automatic Differentiation is Essential in Training Neural Networks for Solving Differential Equationscited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.