mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep Learning-Driven Peptide Classification in Biological Nanopores

arXiv 2509.14029 ↗First posted 17 Sep 2025cs.LG eess.SP physics.comp-phcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Nanopore-based single-molecule sensing is a promising route to fast, low-cost disease diagnosis and protein sequencing: as an analyte such as a peptide or protein traverses a nanoscale pore, it modulates the ionic current, producing a resistive pulse whose signature is determined by the analyte's structure and its interactions with the pore. Translating these signatures into reliable molecular identities, however, is an open problem well suited for machine learning, as the signals are noisy, suffer from variations due to experimental conditions, and are difficult to featurize, which has so far limited classification accuracy. Here we translate the peptide identification problem into an image-classification task by transforming each resistive pulse into a scaleogram via the continuous wavelet transform, a representation that jointly encodes amplitude, frequency, and time in a form well suited for deep convolutional models. On a dataset of 42 peptides, recorded as six separate peptide ladders, this approach reaches a macro-averaged classification accuracy of 82,% on held-out events, an improvement of 8.6 percentage points over the descriptor-based approach previously reported for the same dataset. We further show that the trained models tolerate substantial compression, retaining their accuracy with half of their weights set to zero and under 8-bit quantization, a prerequisite for deploying trained classifiers on embedded sensing hardware. Our results demonstrate how physically motivated signal representations can make complex single-molecule data tractable for modern learning algorithms, a step on the path towards point-of-care peptide and protein diagnostics.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2025.

Builds on

24 of 73 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  5. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  6. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  7. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  8. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  9. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,546
  10. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  11. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,274
  12. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,239
12 more
  1. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
  2. 2021ImageNet-21K Pretraining for the Massescited by 613
  3. 2020What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?cited by 583
  4. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 547
  5. 2021A White Paper on Neural Network Quantizationcited by 472
  6. 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
  7. 2022Tensor Programs V: Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfercited by 288
  8. 2021Pruning and Quantization for Deep Neural Network Acceleration: A Surveycited by 263
  9. 2022Overcoming Oscillations in Quantization-Aware Trainingcited by 119
  10. 2018There Are Many Consistent Explanations of Unlabeled Data: Why You Should Averagecited by 82
  11. 2022PLATON: Pruning Large Transformer Models with Upper Confidence Bound of Weight Importancecited by 79
  12. 2016Towards the Limit of Network Quantizationcited by 50

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Minimal-Action Discrete Schr"odinger Bridge Matching for Peptide Sequence Design
  2. 2026Regressor-guided Diffusion Model for De Novo Peptide Sequencing with Explicit Mass Control
  3. 2024Full-Atom Peptide Design based on Multi-modal Flow Matching
  4. 2025Diffusion Models at the Drug Discovery Frontier: A Review on Generating Small Molecules versus Therapeutic Peptides
  5. 2025DiffMS: Diffusion Generation of Molecules Conditioned on Mass Spectra
  6. 2024Improving Inverse Folding for Peptide Design with Diversity-regularized Direct Preference Optimization
  7. 2025OmegAMP: Targeted AMP Discovery via Biologically Informed Generation
  8. 2022Accelerating Antimicrobial Peptide Discovery with Latent Structure