mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Textarium: Entangling Annotation, Abstraction and Argument

arXiv 2509.13191 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2025cs.HC cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a web-based environment that connects annotation, abstraction, and argumentation during the interpretation of text. As a visual interface for scholarly reading and writing, Textarium combines human analysis with lightweight computational processing to bridge close and distant reading practices. Readers can highlight text, group keywords into concepts, and embed these observations as anchors in essays. The interface renders these interpretive actions as parameterized visualization states. Through a speculative design process of co-creative and iterative prototyping, we developed a reading-writing approach that makes interpretive processes transparent and shareable within digital narratives.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2025.

Builds on

4 of 45 references.

References · 4

  1. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  2. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,583
  3. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  4. 2014Patterns of Text Reuse in a Scientific Corpuscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.