Patterns of Text Reuse in a Scientific Corpus
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the incidence of text "reuse" by researchers, via a systematic pairwise comparison of the text content of all articles deposited to arXiv.org from 1991--2012. We measure the global frequencies of three classes of text reuse, and measure how chronic text reuse is distributed among authors in the dataset. We infer a baseline for accepted practice, perhaps surprisingly permissive compared with other societal contexts, and a clearly delineated set of aberrant authors. We find a negative correlation between the amount of reused text in an article and its influence, as measured by subsequent citations. Finally, we consider the distribution of countries of origin of articles containing large amounts of reused text.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2014.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
5 papers.
- 2023Reception Reader: Exploring Text Reuse in Early Modern British Publicationscited by 4
- 2022SMAuC -- The Scientific Multi-Authorship Corpuscited by 2
- 2025Quantitative Intertextuality from the Digital Humanities Perspective: A Surveycited by 2
- 2021STEREO: Scientific Text Reuse in Open Access Publicationscited by 1
- 2025Textarium: Entangling Annotation, Abstraction and Argumentcited by 0
- 2025Quantitative Intertextuality from the Digital Humanities Perspective: A Survey30 Oct 2025
- 2025Textarium: Entangling Annotation, Abstraction and Argument16 Sep 2025
- 2023Reception Reader: Exploring Text Reuse in Early Modern British Publications8 Feb 2023
- 2022SMAuC -- The Scientific Multi-Authorship Corpus4 Nov 2022
- 2021STEREO: Scientific Text Reuse in Open Access Publications22 Dec 2021