mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding Prompt Management in GitHub Repositories: A Call for Best Practices

arXiv 2509.12421 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2025cs.SE cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid adoption of foundation models (e.g., large language models) has given rise to promptware, i.e., software built using natural language prompts. Effective management of prompts, such as organization and quality assurance, is essential yet challenging. In this study, we perform an empirical analysis of 24,800 open-source prompts from 92 GitHub repositories to investigate prompt management practices and quality attributes. Our findings reveal critical challenges such as considerable inconsistencies in prompt formatting, substantial internal and external prompt duplication, and frequent readability and spelling issues. Based on these findings, we provide actionable recommendations for developers to enhance the usability and maintainability of open-source prompts within the rapidly evolving promptware ecosystem.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2025.

Builds on

6 of 14 references.

References · 6

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  2. 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 779
  3. 2023LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation Datasetcited by 449
  4. 2024Prompting in the Wild: An Empirical Study of Prompt Evolution in Software Repositoriescited by 16
  5. 2025Towards Detecting Prompt Knowledge Gaps for Improved LLM-guided Issue Resolutioncited by 11
  6. 2025Effects of Prompt Length on Domain-specific Tasks for Large Language Modelscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.