mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MEUV: Achieving Fine-Grained Capability Activation in Large Language Models via Mutually Exclusive Unlock Vectors

arXiv 2509.12221 ↗First posted 4 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) enforce safety alignment to reliably refuse malicious requests, yet the same blanket safeguards also block legitimate uses in policing, defense, and other high-stakes settings. Earlier "refusal-direction" edits can bypass those layers, but they rely on a single vector that indiscriminately unlocks all hazardous topics, offering no semantic control. We introduce Mutually Exclusive Unlock Vectors (MEUV), a lightweight framework that factorizes the monolithic refusal direction into topic-aligned, nearly orthogonal vectors, each dedicated to one sensitive capability. MEUV is learned in a single epoch with a multi-task objective that blends a differential-ablation margin, cross-topic and orthogonality penalties, and several auxiliary terms. On bilingual malicious-prompt benchmarks, MEUV achieves an attack success rate of no less than 87% on Gemma-2-2B, LLaMA-3-8B, and Qwen-7B, yet cuts cross-topic leakage by up to 90% compared with the best single-direction baseline. Vectors trained in Chinese transfer almost unchanged to English (and vice versa), suggesting a language-agnostic refusal subspace. The results show that fine-grained, topic-level capability activation is achievable with minimal utility loss, paving the way for controlled LLMs deployment in security-sensitive domains.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 26 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2025.

Builds on

26 of 28 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025The Geometry of Refusal in Large Language Models: Concept Cones and Representational Independence24 Feb
  2. 2024Data Advisor: Dynamic Data Curation for Safety Alignment of Large Language Models7 Oct
  3. 2024SciSafeEval: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Safety Alignment of Large Language Models in Scientific Tasks2 Oct
  4. 2024Automatic Pseudo-Harmful Prompt Generation for Evaluating False Refusals in Large Language Models1 Sep
  5. 2024One-Shot Safety Alignment for Large Language Models via Optimal Dualization29 May
  6. 2024Assessing the Brittleness of Safety Alignment via Pruning and Low-Rank Modifications7 Feb
  7. 2023AutoDAN: Interpretable Gradient-Based Adversarial Attacks on Large Language Models23 Oct
  8. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul

Other references · 18

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  4. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
  5. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
  6. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
  7. 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,220
  8. 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
  9. 2023C-Pack: Packed Resources For General Chinese Embeddingscited by 578
  10. 2023XSTest: A Test Suite for Identifying Exaggerated Safety Behaviours in Large Language Modelscited by 505
  11. 2023Multi-step Jailbreaking Privacy Attacks on ChatGPTcited by 333
  12. 2023Large Language Model Alignment: A Surveycited by 243
6 more
  1. 2024Weak-to-Strong Jailbreaking on Large Language Modelscited by 107
  2. 2023MarioGPT: Open-Ended Text2Level Generation through Large Language Modelscited by 64
  3. 2024Revisiting Jailbreaking for Large Language Models: A Representation Engineering Perspectivecited by 48
  4. 2024Navigating the OverKill in Large Language Modelscited by 44
  5. 2024Jailbreaking Large Language Models Against Moderation Guardrails via Cipher Characterscited by 42
  6. 2024CPSDBench: A Large Language Model Evaluation Benchmark and Baseline for Chinese Public Security Domaincited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Uncovering Safety Risks of Large Language Models through Concept Activation Vector
  2. 2026Faithful Dual-constrained Erasure for Robust LLM Safety Alignment
  3. 2025From Threat to Tool: Leveraging Refusal-Aware Injection Attacks for Safety Alignment
  4. 2025Improving LLM Safety Alignment with Dual-Objective Optimization
  5. 2026RAS: Measuring LLM Safety Through Refusal Alignment
  6. 2025TRIDENT: Enhancing Large Language Model Safety with Tri-Dimensional Diversified Red-Teaming Data Synthesis
  7. 2024Recent Advances in Attack and Defense Approaches of Large Language Models
  8. 2023Latent Jailbreak: A Benchmark for Evaluating Text Safety and Output Robustness of Large Language Models