mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dynamic Relational Priming Improves Transformer in Multivariate Time Series

arXiv 2509.12196 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Standard attention mechanisms in transformers employ static token representations that remain unchanged across all pair-wise computations in each layer. This limits their representational alignment with the potentially diverse relational dynamics of each token-pair interaction. While they excel in domains with relatively homogeneous relationships, standard attention's static relational learning struggles to capture the diverse, heterogeneous inter-channel dependencies of multivariate time series (MTS) data--where different channel-pair interactions within a single system may be governed by entirely different physical laws or temporal dynamics. To better align the attention mechanism for such domain phenomena, we propose attention with dynamic relational priming (prime attention). Unlike standard attention where each token presents an identical representation across all of its pair-wise interactions, prime attention tailors each token dynamically (or per interaction) through learnable modulations to best capture the unique relational dynamics of each token pair, optimizing each pair-wise interaction for that specific relationship. This representational plasticity of prime attention enables effective extraction of relationship-specific information in MTS while maintaining the same asymptotic computational complexity as standard attention. Our results demonstrate that prime attention consistently outperforms standard attention across benchmarks, achieving up to 6.5% improvement in forecasting accuracy. In addition, we find that prime attention achieves comparable or superior performance using up to 40% less sequence length compared to standard attention, further demonstrating its superior relational modeling capabilities.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2025.

Builds on

48 of 63 references.

References · 48

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  5. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  6. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  7. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  8. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
  9. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  10. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,703
  11. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  12. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
36 more
  1. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
  2. 2022A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformerscited by 2,039
  3. 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,694
  4. 2021Autoformer: Decomposition Transformers with Auto-Correlation for Long-Term Series Forecastingcited by 1,676
  5. 2022Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 1,424
  6. 2023iTransformer: Inverted Transformers Are Effective for Time Series Forecastingcited by 931
  7. 2017Modeling Long- and Short-Term Temporal Patterns with Deep Neural Networkscited by 879
  8. 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 835
  9. 2019Heterogeneous Graph Attention Networkcited by 734
  10. 2022Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformercited by 713
  11. 2021E(3)-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Data-Efficient and Accurate Interatomic Potentialscited by 708
  12. 2020Heterogeneous Graph Transformercited by 582
  13. 2019Graph Transformer Networkscited by 523
  14. 2019Are Transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?cited by 406
  15. 2022Non-stationary Transformers: Exploring the Stationarity in Time Series Forecastingcited by 391
  16. 2024TimeMixer: Decomposable Multiscale Mixing for Time Series Forecastingcited by 346
  17. 2024TimeXer: Empowering Transformers for Time Series Forecasting with Exogenous Variablescited by 248
  18. 2023TSMixer: An All-MLP Architecture for Time Series Forecastingcited by 240
  19. 2021Attention Mechanisms in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 232
  20. 2024TimeMixer++: A General Time Series Pattern Machine for Universal Predictive Analysiscited by 116
  21. 2024Round and Round We Go! What makes Rotary Positional Encodings useful?cited by 115
  22. 2023The Capacity and Robustness Trade-off: Revisiting the Channel Independent Strategy for Multivariate Time Series Forecastingcited by 101
  23. 2020Building powerful and equivariant graph neural networks with structural message-passingcited by 97
  24. 2023On the Expressive Power of Geometric Graph Neural Networkscited by 90
  25. 2024Timer-XL: Long-Context Transformers for Unified Time Series Forecastingcited by 87
  26. 2024FreDF: Learning to Forecast in the Frequency Domaincited by 79
  27. 2022Expander Graph Propagationcited by 75
  28. 2025A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Learning for Multivariate Time Series Forecasting: A Channel Strategy Perspectivecited by 58
  29. 2023Are Transformers with One Layer Self-Attention Using Low-Rank Weight Matrices Universal Approximators?cited by 47
  30. 2024Revitalizing Multivariate Time Series Forecasting: Learnable Decomposition with Inter-Series Dependencies and Intra-Series Variations Modelingcited by 44
  31. 2024From Similarity to Superiority: Channel Clustering for Time Series Forecastingcited by 37
  32. 2024Rethinking Channel Dependence for Multivariate Time Series Forecasting: Learning from Leading Indicatorscited by 32
  33. 2025Transformers are Graph Neural Networkscited by 29
  34. 2024Selective Attention Improves Transformercited by 26
  35. 2024Cayley Graph Propagationcited by 21
  36. 2025Universal Approximation with Softmax Attentioncited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.