mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Two-fold Randomization Framework for Impulse Control Problems

arXiv 2509.12018 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2025math.OCcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose and analyze a randomization scheme for a general class of impulse control problems. The solution to this randomized problem is characterized as the fixed point of a compound operator which consists of a regularized nonlocal operator and a regularized stopping operator. This approach allows us to derive a semi-linear Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation. Through an equivalent randomization scheme with a Poisson compound measure, we establish a verification theorem that implies the uniqueness of the solution. Via an iterative approach, we prove the existence of the solution. The existence-and-uniqueness result ensures the randomized problem is well-defined. We then demonstrate that our randomized impulse control problem converges to its classical counterpart as the randomization parameter pmb λ vanishes. This convergence, combined with the value function's C2,αloc regularity, confirms our framework provides a robust approximation and a foundation for developing learning algorithms. Under this framework, we propose an offline reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm. Its policy improvement step is naturally derived from the iterative approach from the existence proof, which enjoys a geometric convergence rate. We implement a model-free version of the algorithm and numerically demonstrate its effectiveness using a widely-studied example. The results show that our RL algorithm can learn the randomized solution, which accurately approximates its classical counterpart. A sensitivity analysis with respect to the volatility parameter σ in the state process effectively demonstrates the exploration-exploitation tradeoff.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Discretization error from regularized Reinforcement Learning to continuous-time stochastic control
  2. 2024Control randomisation approach for policy gradient and application to reinforcement learning in optimal switching
  3. 2026Reinforcement Learning in Real Option Models
  4. 2026Randomized Optimal Switching Problem and Related Mirror Descent Flow
  5. 2024Fixed Point Theory Analysis of a Lambda Policy Iteration with Randomization for the 'Ciri'c Contraction Operator ↗
  6. 2026Policy Gradient over History-Dependent Policy Classes for LQR with Domain Randomization
  7. 2025Policy Gradient for LQR with Domain Randomization
  8. 2026Periodic Regularized Q-Learning