mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Removal Attack and Defense on AI-generated Content Latent-based Watermarking

arXiv 2509.11745 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2025cs.CRcited by 7

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

Digital watermarks can be embedded into AI-generated content (AIGC) by initializing the generation process with starting points sampled from a secret distribution. When combined with pseudorandom error-correcting codes, such watermarked outputs can remain indistinguishable from unwatermarked objects, while maintaining robustness under whitenoise. In this paper, we go beyond indistinguishability and investigate security under removal attacks. We demonstrate that indistinguishability alone does not necessarily guarantee resistance to adversarial removal. Specifically, we propose a novel attack that exploits boundary information leaked by the locations of watermarked objects. This attack significantly reduces the distortion required to remove watermarks -- by up to a factor of 15 × compared to a baseline whitenoise attack under certain settings. To mitigate such attacks, we introduce a defense mechanism that applies a secret transformation to hide the boundary, and prove that the secret transformation effectively rendering any attacker's perturbations equivalent to those of a naive whitenoise adversary. Our empirical evaluations, conducted on multiple versions of Stable Diffusion, validate the effectiveness of both the attack and the proposed defense, highlighting the importance of addressing boundary leakage in latent-based watermarking schemes.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 10 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2025.

Builds on

10 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Black-Box Forgery Attacks on Semantic Watermarks for Diffusion Models4 Dec
  2. 2024An Undetectable Watermark for Generative Image Models9 Oct
  3. 2024Stable Signature is Unstable: Removing Image Watermark from Diffusion Models12 May
  4. 2024Gaussian Shading: Provable Performance-Lossless Image Watermarking for Diffusion Models7 Apr

Other references · 6

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  3. 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,356
  4. 2021SoK: How Robust is Image Classification Deep Neural Network Watermarking? (Extended Version)cited by 69
  5. 2024Compute Better Spent: Replacing Dense Layers with Structured Matricescited by 28
  6. 2024PixelMan: Consistent Object Editing with Diffusion Models via Pixel Manipulation and Generationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025When There Is No Decoder: Removing Watermarks from Stable Diffusion Models in a No-box Setting
  2. 2024Invisible Watermarks: Attacks and Robustness
  3. 2026Attack-Resistant Watermarking for AIGC Image Forensics via Diffusion-based Semantic Deflection
  4. 2023Invisible Image Watermarks Are Provably Removable Using Generative AI
  5. 2026Exploring Weaknesses of Generative Image Watermarks against Latent Frequency Masking
  6. 2024Evaluation of Security of ML-based Watermarking: Copy and Removal Attacks
  7. 2024Robustness of Watermarking on Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
  8. 2023Robustness of AI-Image Detectors: Fundamental Limits and Practical Attacks