mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Tractable Asymmetric Verification for Large Language Models via Deterministic Replicability

arXiv 2509.11068 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2025cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The landscape of Large Language Models (LLMs) shifts rapidly towards dynamic, multi-agent systems. This introduces a fundamental challenge in establishing computational trust, specifically how one agent can verify that another's output was genuinely produced by a claimed LLM, and not falsified or generated by a cheaper or inferior model. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a verification framework that achieves tractable asymmetric effort, where the cost to verify a computation is substantially lower than the cost to perform it. Our approach is built upon the principle of deterministic replicability, a property inherent to autoregressive models that strictly necessitates a computationally homogeneous environment where all agents operate on identical hardware and software stacks. Within this defined context, our framework enables multiple validators to probabilistically audit small, random segments of an LLM's output and it distributes the verification workload effectively. The simulations demonstrated that targeted verification can be over 12 times faster than full regeneration, with tunable parameters to adjust the detection probability. By establishing a tractable mechanism for auditable LLM systems, our work offers a foundational layer for responsible AI and serves as a cornerstone for future research into the more complex, heterogeneous multi-agent systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2025.

Builds on

18 of 28 references.

References · 18

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  2. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  3. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
  4. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
  5. 2024Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Modelscited by 332
  6. 2025Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challengescited by 205
  7. 2019Show Your Work: Improved Reporting of Experimental Resultscited by 169
  8. 2024Emergent social conventions and collective bias in LLM populationscited by 123
  9. 2024A Survey on LLM-based Multi-Agent System: Recent Advances and New Frontiers in Applicationcited by 55
  10. 2024zkLLM: Zero Knowledge Proofs for Large Language Modelscited by 51
  11. 2025Trust Me, I'm Wrong: LLMs Hallucinate with Certainty Despite Knowing the Answercited by 27
  12. 2025CodeAgents: A Token-Efficient Framework for Codified Multi-Agent Reasoning in LLMscited by 9
6 more
  1. 2025MAEBE: Multi-Agent Emergent Behavior Frameworkcited by 8
  2. 2025On the Fundamental Impossibility of Hallucination Control in Large Language Modelscited by 7
  3. 2025Toward Verifiable Misinformation Detection: A Multi-Tool LLM Agent Frameworkcited by 6
  4. 2025AIRepr: An Analyst-Inspector Framework for Evaluating Reproducibility of LLMs in Data Sciencecited by 4
  5. 2025Responsible Innovation: A Strategic Framework for Financial LLM Integrationcited by 2
  6. 2025Do Language Models Have Bayesian Brains? Distinguishing Stochastic and Deterministic Decision Patterns within Large Language Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.