mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Physics-informed sensor coverage through structure preserving machine learning

arXiv 2509.10363 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.NA math.NAcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a machine learning framework for adaptive source localization in which agents use a structure-preserving digital twin of a coupled hydrodynamic-transport system for real-time trajectory planning and data assimilation. The twin is constructed with conditional neural Whitney forms (CNWF), coupling the numerical guarantees of finite element exterior calculus (FEEC) with transformer-based operator learning. The resulting model preserves discrete conservation, and adapts in real time to streaming sensor data. It employs a conditional attention mechanism to identify: a reduced Whitney-form basis; reduced integral balance equations; and a source field, each compatible with given sensor measurements. The induced reduced-order environmental model retains the stability and consistency of standard finite-element simulation, yielding a physically realizable, regular mapping from sensor data to the source field. We propose a staggered scheme that alternates between evaluating the digital twin and applying Lloyd's algorithm to guide sensor placement, with analysis providing conditions for monotone improvement of a coverage functional. Using the predicted source field as an importance function within an optimal-recovery scheme, we demonstrate recovery of point sources under continuity assumptions, highlighting the role of regularity as a sufficient condition for localization. Experimental comparisons with physics-agnostic transformer architectures show improved accuracy in complex geometries when physical constraints are enforced, indicating that structure preservation provides an effective inductive bias for source identification.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2025.

Builds on

18 of 70 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  3. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
  4. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  5. 2016Group Equivariant Convolutional Networkscited by 1,165
  6. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 712
  7. 2021Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A reviewcited by 473
  8. 2021Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problemscited by 222
  9. 2020Estimates on the generalization error of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for approximating a class of inverse problems for PDEscited by 102
  10. 2022Clifford Neural Layers for PDE Modelingcited by 92
  11. 2022Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in supersonic flowscited by 76
  12. 2023Neural Inverse Operators for Solving PDE Inverse Problemscited by 65
6 more
  1. 2020Structure-preserving neural networkscited by 55
  2. 2019Deep learning architectures for nonlinear operator functions and nonlinear inverse problemscited by 17
  3. 2025Structure-Preserving Digital Twins via Conditional Neural Whitney Formscited by 8
  4. 2025On the definition and importance of interpretability in scientific machine learningcited by 5
  5. 2014Multi-Robot Control Using Time-Varying Density Functionscited by 3
  6. 2017Model-Based Active Source Identification in Complex Environmentscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.