Immunizing Images from Text to Image Editing via Adversarial Cross-Attention
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in text-based image editing have enabled fine-grained manipulation of visual content guided by natural language. However, such methods are susceptible to adversarial attacks. In this work, we propose a novel attack that targets the visual component of editing methods. We introduce Attention Attack, which disrupts the cross-attention between a textual prompt and the visual representation of the image by using an automatically generated caption of the source image as a proxy for the edit prompt. This breaks the alignment between the contents of the image and their textual description, without requiring knowledge of the editing method or the editing prompt. Reflecting on the reliability of existing metrics for immunization success, we propose two novel evaluation strategies: Caption Similarity, which quantifies semantic consistency between original and adversarial edits, and semantic Intersection over Union (IoU), which measures spatial layout disruption via segmentation masks. Experiments conducted on the TEDBench++ benchmark demonstrate that our attack significantly degrades editing performance while remaining imperceptible.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2025.
Builds on
28 of 43 references.
References · 28
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,255
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,058
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2022DreamBooth: Fine Tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Subject-Driven Generationcited by 3,300
- 2022An Image is Worth One Word: Personalizing Text-to-Image Generation using Textual Inversioncited by 2,245
- 2023An Edit Friendly DDPM Noise Space: Inversion and Manipulationscited by 244
- 2023Glaze: Protecting Artists from Style Mimicry by Text-to-Image Modelscited by 205
16 more
- 2023Unsafe Diffusion: On the Generation of Unsafe Images and Hateful Memes From Text-To-Image Modelscited by 175
- 2023Raising the Cost of Malicious AI-Powered Image Editingcited by 163
- 2021Adversarial Examples Make Strong Poisonscited by 119
- 2023Mist: Towards Improved Adversarial Examples for Diffusion Modelscited by 94
- 2019Preventing Posterior Collapse with delta-VAEscited by 86
- 2023Dynamic Prompt Learning: Addressing Cross-Attention Leakage for Text-Based Image Editingcited by 76
- 2023Toward effective protection against diffusion based mimicry through score distillationcited by 65
- 2023EditVal: Benchmarking Diffusion Based Text-Guided Image Editing Methodscited by 54
- 2024UnsafeBench: Benchmarking Image Safety Classifiers on Real-World and AI-Generated Imagescited by 53
- 2023Text-Driven Image Editing via Learnable Regionscited by 31
- 2021TAFIM: Targeted Adversarial Attacks against Facial Image Manipulationscited by 26
- 2024Adversarial Nibbler: An Open Red-Teaming Method for Identifying Diverse Harms in Text-to-Image Generationcited by 20
- 2021Attack as the Best Defense: Nullifying Image-to-image Translation GANs via Limit-aware Adversarial Attackcited by 15
- 2024A Gray-box Attack against Latent Diffusion Model-based Image Editing by Posterior Collapsecited by 13
- 2024DiffVax: Optimization-Free Image Immunization Against Diffusion-Based Editingcited by 10
- 2025GuardDoor: Safeguarding Against Malicious Diffusion Editing via Protective Backdoorscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.