QuantHarness: Price-Driven Multi-Agent LLMs for High-Frequency Trading
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in financial reasoning and market understanding. Multi-agent LLM frameworks such as TradingAgent and FINMEM augment these models to long-horizon investment tasks by leveraging fundamental and sentiment-based inputs for strategic decision-making. However, these approaches are ill-suited for the high-speed, precision-critical demands of High-Frequency Trading (HFT). HFT typically requires rapid, risk-aware decisions driven by structured, short-horizon signals, such as technical indicators, chart patterns, and trend features. These signals stand in sharp contrast to the long-horizon, text-driven reasoning that characterizes most existing LLM-based systems in finance. To bridge this gap, we introduce QuantHarness, the first multi-agent LLM framework explicitly designed for high-frequency algorithmic trading. The system decomposes trading into four specialized agents--Indicator, Pattern, Trend, and Risk--each equipped with domain-specific tools and structured reasoning capabilities to capture distinct aspects of market dynamics over short temporal windows. Extensive experiments across nine financial instruments, including Bitcoin and Nasdaq futures, demonstrate that QuantHarness consistently outperforms baseline methods, achieving higher predictive accuracy at both 1-hour and 4-hour trading intervals across multiple evaluation metrics. Our findings suggest that coupling structured trading signals with LLM-based reasoning provides a viable path for traceable, real-time decision systems in high-frequency financial markets.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 8.
10 papers.
- 2025TimeSeriesScientist: A General-Purpose AI Agent for Time Series Analysiscited by 22
- 2026Look-Ahead-Bench: a Standardized Benchmark of Look-ahead Bias in Point-in-Time LLMs for Financecited by 13
- 2026When to Think, When to Speak: Learning Disclosure Policies for LLM Reasoningcited by 5
- 2026The End of Reward Engineering: How LLMs Are Redefining Multi-Agent Coordinationcited by 3
- 2026The Alpha Illusion: Reported Alpha from LLM Trading Agents Should Not Be Treated as Deployment Evidencecited by 3
- 2025Reflection Pretraining Enables Token-Level Self-Correction in Biological Sequence Modelscited by 0
- 2026FinBoardBench: Benchmarking Dynamic Wealth Management and Strategic Financial Reasoning of LLMs via Board Game Simulationscited by 0
- 2026When LLM Meets Tree Search: A Systematic View of Inference as Search in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Agent Memory with Episodic Retrieval for Financial Decision-Makingcited by 0
- 2026LiveOption: Evaluating LLM Agents in Structured Option Trading with Nonlinear Payoffscited by 0
- 2026LiveOption: Evaluating LLM Agents in Structured Option Trading with Nonlinear Payoffs27 Sep 2026
- 2026Agent Memory with Episodic Retrieval for Financial Decision-Making23 Sep 2026
- 2026When LLM Meets Tree Search: A Systematic View of Inference as Search in Large Language Models31 Aug 2026
- 2026FinBoardBench: Benchmarking Dynamic Wealth Management and Strategic Financial Reasoning of LLMs via Board Game Simulations27 May 2026
- 2026The Alpha Illusion: Reported Alpha from LLM Trading Agents Should Not Be Treated as Deployment Evidence16 May 2026
- 2026When to Think, When to Speak: Learning Disclosure Policies for LLM Reasoning5 May 2026
- 2026Look-Ahead-Bench: a Standardized Benchmark of Look-ahead Bias in Point-in-Time LLMs for Finance20 Jan 2026
- 2026The End of Reward Engineering: How LLMs Are Redefining Multi-Agent Coordination13 Jan 2026
- 2025Reflection Pretraining Enables Token-Level Self-Correction in Biological Sequence Models24 Dec 2025
- 2025TimeSeriesScientist: A General-Purpose AI Agent for Time Series Analysis2 Oct 2025